2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2014.0716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐step radiographic image enhancement conforming to weld defect segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study uses four performance metrics: F1, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Sensitivity, and Relative Segmentation Accuracy (RSA) [21]. Accuracy was not used in this study because it was judged not suitable for measuring performance for segmentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses four performance metrics: F1, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Sensitivity, and Relative Segmentation Accuracy (RSA) [21]. Accuracy was not used in this study because it was judged not suitable for measuring performance for segmentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, manual threshold values are to be finetuned for different images, and it is not suitable for all types of images. Multi Step Radiographic enhancement proposed in [3] also aimed at segmenting the defective welds through image processing. Their image processing algorithm involved the key components including linear weighting process that combines a CLAHE enhanced image with the normal image to improve the image contrast.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fuzzy set theory, image I can be defined as [15] right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptI=μ1(gij)gij,i=1,2,3,I,j=1,2,3,,J Here U1false(gijfalse) represents the grey level brightness degree acquired by the grey‐level intensity corresponding to pixel ( i,j ). Image histograms are described as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptU1(g)ϵLmin,Lmax …”
Section: Type‐ii Fuzzy Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%