2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.928933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-species beam hardening calibration device for x-ray microtomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, scanning was briefly interrupted approximately every 24 hours to reduce the filament current to the minimum level that provided an acceptable focus and to refresh the reservoir; this took approximately 10 minutes. A calibration carousel was also scanned at the end of each 24-hour period [15]. The voxel size was set to 30 µm, with 927 projections around 360⁰, taking 2.6 hours, allowing 9 scans per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, scanning was briefly interrupted approximately every 24 hours to reduce the filament current to the minimum level that provided an acceptable focus and to refresh the reservoir; this took approximately 10 minutes. A calibration carousel was also scanned at the end of each 24-hour period [15]. The voxel size was set to 30 µm, with 927 projections around 360⁰, taking 2.6 hours, allowing 9 scans per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately following the scan, a multi‐element calibration carousel (Evershed et al. ) was scanned to characterise the X‐ray spectrum. As direct measurement of the X‐ray spectrum is almost impossible (with the degree of accuracy required), a modelled estimate of the spectrum was made.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-material objects, this calibration, with additional Segmentation and estimation of the path-length, is required for each material, since they all have unique attenuation-distance curves [17]. For two materials, this can be avoided by assuming the lower attenuating material has zero attenuation [18]. Nevertheless, it is common to choose a single curve to correct the entire dataset even if the correction is only approximate (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%