2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi slot versus single slot pool-type fishways: A modelling approach to compare hydrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to assess the effects of hydrodynamics on the fish behavior, numerical modelling (the 3D CFD model FLOW-3D ® ) was used in this study to characterize influential hydrodynamic variables, such as velocity magnitude, TKE, and water depths, present in each configuration tested, in order to identify areas of high velocity and turbulence gradients that might have affected the fish movements. Over the last few years, 3D CFD models have proved to be a practical and robust tool to characterize hydrodynamics on several hydraulic structures, being widely used for the assessment of fish passages (e.g., studies on functioning over a wide range of discharges, prediction of suitable conditions for fish), optimization of designs, and evaluation of different retrofitting solutions [52][53][54][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. However, given that uncertainty in CFD modelling for environmental fluid mechanics in complex flow fields, like the flow field in the vicinity of a macro-scale roughness (e.g., wake region), can arise from a very wide range of sources, care should be taken when performing a numerical model study [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, to assess the effects of hydrodynamics on the fish behavior, numerical modelling (the 3D CFD model FLOW-3D ® ) was used in this study to characterize influential hydrodynamic variables, such as velocity magnitude, TKE, and water depths, present in each configuration tested, in order to identify areas of high velocity and turbulence gradients that might have affected the fish movements. Over the last few years, 3D CFD models have proved to be a practical and robust tool to characterize hydrodynamics on several hydraulic structures, being widely used for the assessment of fish passages (e.g., studies on functioning over a wide range of discharges, prediction of suitable conditions for fish), optimization of designs, and evaluation of different retrofitting solutions [52][53][54][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. However, given that uncertainty in CFD modelling for environmental fluid mechanics in complex flow fields, like the flow field in the vicinity of a macro-scale roughness (e.g., wake region), can arise from a very wide range of sources, care should be taken when performing a numerical model study [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is used to represent obstacles through fractional areas and volumes in the fixed orthogonal grid. Flow Science [50] presents additional details regarding the theoretical and numerical fundamentals of FLOW-3D ® , which has been used in recent years to characterize flow hydrodynamics in ecohydraulics and fishway research (e.g., [52][53][54]).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pool-type fishways consist of a sloping-floor channel separated by cross-walls into a series of pools, so that the height to be negotiated by the fish is divided into several small drops [12]. The first devices of this type date back to the nineteenth century [10,13], with many design variations (mainly changes in the pool geometry or in the openings between pools) developed since then (e.g., [16][17][18][19][20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, such as Cea et al (2007) and Stamou et al (2018), have sought to evaluate other types of turbulence models for RANS simulations in fishways. There are also some large-scale simulation (LES) approaches to estimating the flow in fishways, such as Fuentes-Pérez et al (2018) and Quaresma et al (2018). However, RANS simulations have lower computational costs and are more accessible (TAJNESAIE et al, 2018).…”
Section: Turbulence Kinetic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%