2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
313
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
21
313
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The root mean square deviation (RMSD) and biases for all the models fell within a small range with the highest correlation with tower data for PT-JPL, and the lowest for SEBS. These results somewhat disagree with the work of Ershadi et al (2014) who inspected the performance of SEBS, the single-source Penman-Monteith, advection-aridity (AA) complementary method (Brutsaert and Stricker, 1979) and PT-JPL using a high quality forcing dataset from 20 FLUXNET stations and 30 found that the models can be ranked from the best to the worst model as: PT-JPL followed closely by SEBS then PM and finally AA. In the same study, a more detailed analysis revealed that no single model was consistently the best across all landscapes.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The root mean square deviation (RMSD) and biases for all the models fell within a small range with the highest correlation with tower data for PT-JPL, and the lowest for SEBS. These results somewhat disagree with the work of Ershadi et al (2014) who inspected the performance of SEBS, the single-source Penman-Monteith, advection-aridity (AA) complementary method (Brutsaert and Stricker, 1979) and PT-JPL using a high quality forcing dataset from 20 FLUXNET stations and 30 found that the models can be ranked from the best to the worst model as: PT-JPL followed closely by SEBS then PM and finally AA. In the same study, a more detailed analysis revealed that no single model was consistently the best across all landscapes.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Zhang et al (2016) pointed out that merging an ensemble of gridded ET products using a sophisticated data fusion method is 15 likely to generate a better ET product with reduced uncertainty. Ershadi et al (2014) and McCabe et al (2016) noted in their studies that the multi-product mean produces improved estimates relative to individual ET products. Similarly, the analysis result of the LandFlux-EVAL project (Mueller et al, 2013) suggested that deriving ET values using the mean of multiple datasets outperforms the ET values from individual datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We fitted a PM transpiration model to the observed plot level latent heat flux and then tested the effects of soil moisture on the residual between the observed evapotranspiration and the model's predictions. We chose the PM model for this analysis as it is widely used and accepted for estimating LE, while it does not include any mechanistic link between soil water potential and stomatal conductance [Ershadi et al, 2014;Stannard, 1993]. The PM model predictions for transpiration, E PM (W m À2 ) therefore represent our null hypothesis to test for species/size, and soil moisture effects on transpiration.…”
Section: Penman-monteith Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the uncertainty caused by the retrieval of various vegetation parameters, such as fractional vegetation coverage and vegetation index, based on the component of SEBS, as a reference we used the field experiment database (http://www.ral.ucar.edu/research/land/technology/lsm/ noahlsm-v3.2/VEGPARM.TBL), which has been widely used around the world (Acharya et al, 2011;Ching, 2013;Ershadi et al, 2014;Gottschalck et al, 2005).…”
Section: Improvement Of Sebs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%