Multi-scenario simulation of production-living-ecological space and ecological effects based on shared socioeconomic pathways in Zhengzhou, China

Jiang, Xintong; Zhai, Shiyan; Liu, Huan; Chen, Jing; Zhu, Yueyue; Wang, Zheng

doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108750

Cited by 49 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The coupling coordination of PLES is an extension of the connotation of coordinating the man-land relationship and promoting sustainable development [ 2 , 10 , 11 ]. Previous studies on PLES mainly focused on PLES classification [ 15 ], index construction [ 2 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], pattern evolution [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], spatial conflict [ 4 , 5 ], spatial optimization [ 8 , 9 , 16 , 22 , 23 ], eco-environmental effect [ 6 , 24 , 25 ], and coupling coordination analysis [ 2 , 11 , 12 ]. Specifically, regarding the classification of PLES, previous scholars have completed abundant studies on land classification and evaluation systems based on different research perspectives [ 2 , 17 , 26 ].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Cui

Chen

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Territorial space is a multi-functional complex. The coordinated production-living-ecological space (PLES) effectively coordinates the man-land relationship, promotes regional sustainable development, and maximizes territorial space. How to build a high-quality national spatial layout and support system for development has become a hot topic of concern in all sectors of society. However, few studies have explored the coupling coordination considering the various production-living-ecological functions of land use type and its influencing factors of PLES at the county scale in China. To address the gap, based on the connotation of PLES theory, this study established a classification and evaluation system for PLES and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics, coupling coordination degree, spatial autocorrelation, and influencing factors of PLES in China from 2000 to 2020. The results are as follows: (1) The production space index and living space index in China showed a continuous increase tendency, while the ecological space index decreased continuously during the study period. The production space and living space were concentrated in the east of Hu Line, and the ecological space indexes in mountainous areas were significantly higher than those in plain areas during the study period. (2) The gravity centers of PLES all migrated to the west of China to different degrees during the study period. (3) From 2000 to 2020, the basically balanced category was the main coupling coordination type, and the number of seriously unbalanced categories accounted for the least. In the west of the Hu Line, the seriously unbalanced category was dominant, while in the east of the Hu Line were the moderately unbalanced categories and above. (4) During the study period, the low-low type was the main relationship type, widely distributed in western China, followed by the high-high type, mainly situated in the North China Plain, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Jianghan Plain, Chengdu Plain, Northeast China Plain, and some provincial capital cities. (5) Regression results showed that natural factors were the main reason restricting the coordinated development of PLES, and socioeconomic factors could effectively promote the coordinated development of PLES. Landscape pattern also significantly influenced the coordinated development of PLES, but varied greatly. The findings of this study can provide a scientific reference for the optimization of territorial space layout and the promotion of high-quality development of territorial space.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Cui

Chen

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The production-living-ecological space division method coincides with the sustainable development three-pillar concept [34]. Land-use transitions can be linked with regional development transformation, which is becoming an important entry point for studying land-use transitions [35]. In China and some developing countries, rapid urbanization and rapid economic development have brought about huge changes in PLES [36].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Pang

Zhou

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the perspective of the production–living–ecological space, this paper reclassifies the land-use categories in the central and southern Liaoning urban agglomeration in the years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2018. It then quantitatively analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land-use transitions by adopting the land-use transfer matrix and other methods. This paper further uses the eco-environmental quality index and ecological contribution rate to explore the eco-environmental effects of the land-use transition. Finally, it identifies the influencing factors of the eco-environmental effect and the spatial differentiation law of the effect in the study area through the multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model. The main conclusions reached are as follows: (1) During the study period, a slow increase was seen in the ecological land of the central and southern Liaoning urban agglomeration. A sharp decline occurred in the production land, and a rapid rise was found in the living land. (2) From 1990 to 2018, the eco-environmental quality index in the study region showed significant spatial differentiation, with the distribution characteristics being high in the east and low in the west. The areas have expanded and spread along the Shenyang-Dalian axis to form medium-low quality agglomerations. The encroachment of agricultural production land and urban and rural living land on forest ecological land is the main contributor to the deterioration of the eco-environmental quality during the study period. (3) Compared with the geographically weighted regression model and the ordinary least squares model, a remarkable advancement can be seen in the MGWR model, which is more suitable for research on the influencing factors of eco-environmental quality. In addition, different influencing factors have significant spatial differences in the degree and scale of impact.

show abstract

“…Living spaces are the areas that provide the main functions of human living and public activities [11]. Since the food, energy, and resources of rural life are from agricultural production and the ecological environment, the sustainable development of rural areas is considered the comprehensive development of PLE [12,13]. The report to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in November 2012 clearly stated the development goals of "promoting intensive and efficient production space, livable and appropriate living space, and beautiful ecological space [14]".…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rural PLE spaces are important load-bearing spatial patterns of rural revitalization. In recent years, studies on PLE spaces include connotation and formation of the mechanism of PLE spaces [2], measurement and recognition of PLE spaces [24][25][26][27], conflict and synergies of PLE spaces [28,29], evolution and simulation of PLE spaces [12,30,31], reconstruction and optimization of PLE spaces [11,23,32], etc. The identification of PLE spaces, as a research basis, is the spatial positioning and division of the quantity and quality of the current production, living, and ecological spaces.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces

Zhao

Cheng

Fan

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, the spatial contradiction in rural construction has intensified. Production–living–ecological (PLE) spaces, as important load-bearing spatial patterns of rural revitalization, have become a research focus of territorial space planning. Because of the lack of studies on the scale and accuracy at the township level in rural PLE spaces, the objective of this study is to quantify the subfunctional and functional areas of PLE spaces, weigh the relationship between PLE functions, and conduct feature identification and strategy formulation of the PLE synergistic functional areas. Combined with multitype measurement methods, the study constructed a township-level PLE space evaluation system composed of 12 subfunctional indicators. Taking Guli Street in Nanjing city as an example, Spearman correlation analysis, spatial local autocorrelation analysis, and cold/hot spot identification were used to analyze the synergies and tradeoffs between PLE functions. On this basis, the evaluation model of the PLE synergies area was constructed. The results showed that the production function showed a fragmented distribution pattern. The proportion of high-intensity living function areas was very small. The ecological function area had good patch integrity. In the PLE functions, obvious synergies exist between any two functions, and the tradeoff between the third one and any of the two functions. The seven types of PLE synergistic potential areas were dominated by the dual-function high synergistic zone (DF-H-Z). The zoning scheme and governance strategy proposed in this paper have important practical value for solving the contradiction of sustainable and coordinated development of township-scale spatial resources.

show abstract

Multi-scenario simulation of production-living-ecological space and ecological effects based on shared socioeconomic pathways in Zhengzhou, China

Cited by 49 publications

References 34 publications

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China

Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective

Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About