2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(00)00163-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale system approaches in agronomic research at the landscape level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One is related to the process through which farmers decide to sow one crop or another in a specific location. This is a complex process that is not only governed by the factors determining the biophysical land suitability, but it could depend on multiple drivers that should be considered under a spatial multi-scale analysis approach (Veldkamp et al, 2001;Verdoodt and van Ranst, 2006). In addition to biophysical constrains (soil salinity and sodicity, limitations of irrigation water in some years or rotational requirements in particular), farmers' decisions in the study area are influenced by CAP subsidies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is related to the process through which farmers decide to sow one crop or another in a specific location. This is a complex process that is not only governed by the factors determining the biophysical land suitability, but it could depend on multiple drivers that should be considered under a spatial multi-scale analysis approach (Veldkamp et al, 2001;Verdoodt and van Ranst, 2006). In addition to biophysical constrains (soil salinity and sodicity, limitations of irrigation water in some years or rotational requirements in particular), farmers' decisions in the study area are influenced by CAP subsidies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although it is widely accepted that farmers are the best experts at understanding local environments, their decisions are strongly influenced by a range of factors such as market demands, prices or subsidies in addition to the biophysical suitability of the land for specific uses (Veldkamp et al, 2001;Bontkes and Keulen, 2003;Ambrosio Flores et al, 2008). This means that land uses are often not in agreement with land suitability (fitness of a given type of land for a specified kind of crop or land use; FAO, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zones of Use is a concentric model of land use planning intended to maximize farm labor productivity, by siting land uses that require frequent management or use closer to the home or other centers of activity (Mollison and Holmgren 1978;Mollison 1988 These principles of agroecosystem configuration, while lacking an explicit parallel discussion in the scientific literature, appear reasonably well supported by existing science. This lack of consideration of spatial relationships in agronomy has been noted by many authors (Cavazza 1996;Veldkamp et al 2001;Hatfield 2007;Osty 2008;cited in Benoit et al 2012). Configuration is a nevertheless an implicit issue for land use functions that depend on spatial and topographic relationships, including windbreaks, runoff filtration, habitat provision, nitrogen fixation in polycropping (Ajayi 1987;Fujita et al 1992), contour cultivation (Tacio 1993;Bunch 2002), and soil and water conservation.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The present study, as part of this project, addresses the characterization and mapping of the spatial variability of these metals. The characterization of the spatial variability of soil attributes is essential to achieve a better understanding of the complex relations between soil properties, environmental factors and land use (Veldkamp et al, 2001;Yemefack et al, 2005). The problems associated with the characterization of heavy metals in the majority of sites are often due to multiple sources of pollution (Serrano et al, 1984;Boluda et al, 1988;Hanesch et al, 2001;Zarcinas et al, 2004) which can act on different scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%