IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477)
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2003.1294614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-resolution imaging spectroscopy resolving the structure of heterogeneous canopies for forest fire fuel properties mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various approaches and techniques have been used with different application perspectives and varying level of success, for estimating leaf water content with wide ranging spatial scales, including terrestrial lidar (Elsherif et al, 2019a;Junttila et al, 2019;Junttila et al, 2021), imaging spectroscopy (Kotz et al, 2004), terahertz radiation spectroscopy (Browne et al, 2020) and microwave remote sensing (Konings et al, 2019). However, considering leaf water content monitoring from single trees several times a day (which is required for monitoring diurnal differences in leaf water content) there are still many limiting factors with existing remote sensing methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches and techniques have been used with different application perspectives and varying level of success, for estimating leaf water content with wide ranging spatial scales, including terrestrial lidar (Elsherif et al, 2019a;Junttila et al, 2019;Junttila et al, 2021), imaging spectroscopy (Kotz et al, 2004), terahertz radiation spectroscopy (Browne et al, 2020) and microwave remote sensing (Konings et al, 2019). However, considering leaf water content monitoring from single trees several times a day (which is required for monitoring diurnal differences in leaf water content) there are still many limiting factors with existing remote sensing methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%