2018
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2018.1551530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-residue method for trace pesticide analysis in soils by LC-QQQ-MS/MS and its application to real samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MLOQs of the developed analytical method are between one and two orders of magnitude more sensitive in comparison to other methods dealing with the analysis of pesticides in soil (e.g., MLOQ (number of pesticides included in the respective study) in Geissen et al [ 15 ], 1–20 ng/g (36–75); Silva et al [ 8 ], 10 ng/g (76); Łozowicka et al [ 16 ], 5–10 ng/g (216); Kosubová et al [ 9 ], 3–10 ng/g (64); Hvězdová et al [ 10 ], 3–10 ng/g (68); Colazzo et al [ 53 ], 1–10 ng/g (30)). Only few studies reported MLOQs below 0.5 ng/g (Riedo et al [ 6 ], 0.04–36 ng/g (46); Lafay et al [ 11 ], 0.01–5.5 ng/g (31); Acosta-Dacal et al [ 13 ], 0.5–20 ng/g (218); Homazava et al [ 42 ], 0.1–2.9 ng/g (25); Pose-Juan et al [ 12 ], 0.2–0.7 ng/g (17); Pelosi et al [ 18 ], 0.01–5.5 ng/g (31)), at which most of the studies with MLOQs below 0.5 ng/g analyzed only between 17 and 46 pesticides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLOQs of the developed analytical method are between one and two orders of magnitude more sensitive in comparison to other methods dealing with the analysis of pesticides in soil (e.g., MLOQ (number of pesticides included in the respective study) in Geissen et al [ 15 ], 1–20 ng/g (36–75); Silva et al [ 8 ], 10 ng/g (76); Łozowicka et al [ 16 ], 5–10 ng/g (216); Kosubová et al [ 9 ], 3–10 ng/g (64); Hvězdová et al [ 10 ], 3–10 ng/g (68); Colazzo et al [ 53 ], 1–10 ng/g (30)). Only few studies reported MLOQs below 0.5 ng/g (Riedo et al [ 6 ], 0.04–36 ng/g (46); Lafay et al [ 11 ], 0.01–5.5 ng/g (31); Acosta-Dacal et al [ 13 ], 0.5–20 ng/g (218); Homazava et al [ 42 ], 0.1–2.9 ng/g (25); Pose-Juan et al [ 12 ], 0.2–0.7 ng/g (17); Pelosi et al [ 18 ], 0.01–5.5 ng/g (31)), at which most of the studies with MLOQs below 0.5 ng/g analyzed only between 17 and 46 pesticides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Uruguay, the presence of pesticide residues has been reported in watercourses and drinking water (37)(38) , in soil (39)(40) , in the air (41) , in beehives and in component parts of beehives (42)(43)(44)(45) , and in agrifoods (46)(47)(48) . Furthermore, there are several studies on the effect of the use of pesticide products at the biota level in environmental compartments (49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57) .…”
Section: Toxicology and Ecotoxicology Characterization Of Major Used ...mentioning
confidence: 99%