2007
DOI: 10.1243/14644193jmbd77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-physics analysis of valve train systems: From system level to microscale interactions

Abstract: The paper highlights a holistic, integrated, and multi-disciplinary approach to design analysis of valve train systems, referred to as multi-physics. The analysis comprises various forms of physical phenomena and their interactions, including large displacement inertial dynamics, small amplitude oscillations due to system compliances, tribology, contact mechanics, and durability at the cam-tappet contact. Therefore, it also represents a multi-scale investigation, where the phenomena can be investigated at syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, boundary shear strength of surfaces contributes to friction, given by ς . For surfaces with a layer of ferrous oxide: (27) where ζκσ is the roughness parameter (Bowden and Tabor (28)), ' E is the equivalent plane strain elastic modulus of the counterfaces and the statistical functions are of the form:…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, boundary shear strength of surfaces contributes to friction, given by ς . For surfaces with a layer of ferrous oxide: (27) where ζκσ is the roughness parameter (Bowden and Tabor (28)), ' E is the equivalent plane strain elastic modulus of the counterfaces and the statistical functions are of the form:…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, if the average film thickness is less than three times the composite surface roughness, the surface asperities will force direct solid-solid contact [15,17]. In this study, we measure the surface roughness of the crank pin journal and bearing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary friction is due to the interaction of counterface asperities, as well as any pockets of lubricant entrapped between them, which are assumed to be subject to the limiting Eyring [25] shear stress as [9]:…”
Section: The Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the result, many contacts suffer from a lack of a coherent lubricant film where a proportion of applied load is carried by the ubiquitous asperities on the counterface surfaces. These interactions increase the generated friction, for example in the cases of piston-cylinder system at dead centre reversals [5][6][7][8] and cam-follower contact in the inlet reversal positions [9]. Various palliative actions are undertaken in order to mitigate these adverse effects within the mixed regime of lubrication, including the use of hard wear-resistant coatings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%