2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective vehicle routing problem with time windows using goal programming and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the efficiency of different algorithms to VRPTW, The state-of-the-art method of Goal Programming and Genetic Algorithm (GPGA) [28], Improved Large Neighborhood Search (I-LNS) [22] and Ant Colony Optimization Hybridized with Insertion Heuristics (ACO-IH) [25] are used to compare HPSO. The results of comparison experiments of VRPTW are shown in Tables 6-8.…”
Section: Comparison Results Of Hpso With Other State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to compare the efficiency of different algorithms to VRPTW, The state-of-the-art method of Goal Programming and Genetic Algorithm (GPGA) [28], Improved Large Neighborhood Search (I-LNS) [22] and Ant Colony Optimization Hybridized with Insertion Heuristics (ACO-IH) [25] are used to compare HPSO. The results of comparison experiments of VRPTW are shown in Tables 6-8.…”
Section: Comparison Results Of Hpso With Other State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most implementations of ACO combined with other algorithms return feasibility to the solutions by applying a simple ad hoc post-insertion procedure, and when the post-insertion fails to route all the clients, the partial solution is discarded. (5) GA can also be combined with other algorithms to solve VRPTW [28,29]. GA mimics the evolution process in solving problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (11) defines the domain of the decision variable X k i j . Most researchers consider minimizing the number of vehicles as the primary objective (Bräysy, 2003), while others study it as a multi-objective problem (Ghoseiri and Ghannadpour, 2010). In the former case, a two-phase approach is often used, to minimize the vehicle number firstly and then minimize the distance with a fixed route number in the second phase.…”
Section: Problem Description and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C1 and C2, customers are located in a number of clusters, while the objectives of (1) and (2) are positively related (Ghoseiri and Ghannadpour, 2010). Customers of R1 and R2 are randomly distributed geographically, while RC1 and RC2 are a mix of them.…”
Section: Problem Dataset and Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, various heuristic algorithms that do not guarantee obtaining the optimal solution but execute very fast have been introduced to solve the VRPTW in a short time, and became a main stream of development in this field. They encompass simulated annealing (Zhong and Pan 2007), tabu searches (Ho and Haugland 2004), ant colony systems (Gambardella et al 1999;Gomez et al 2014), swarm optimization algorithms (Hu et al 2013), evolutionary approaches (Repoussis et al 2009), genetic and memetic algorithms (GAs and MAs) (Ghoseiri and Ghannadpour 2010;Nagata et al 2010;Nalepa and Czech 2013;Vidal et al 2013;, and more (Bräysy and Gendreau 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%