2011
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2010.502935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective topology optimization using evolutionary algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two popular, well known topological methods are the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach and the homogenization method, which use gradient-based optimizers. Later, an alternative optimizer is evolutionary algorithms due to the fact they are robust, simple to use, derivative-free, and free from intermediate pseudo densities [8]. Complicated problems, such as partial topology, simultaneous topology, shape, and sizing optimization, can be performed within one optimization run [3,8,16,17] by using such algorithms.…”
Section: Topological Designs With Ground Element Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two popular, well known topological methods are the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach and the homogenization method, which use gradient-based optimizers. Later, an alternative optimizer is evolutionary algorithms due to the fact they are robust, simple to use, derivative-free, and free from intermediate pseudo densities [8]. Complicated problems, such as partial topology, simultaneous topology, shape, and sizing optimization, can be performed within one optimization run [3,8,16,17] by using such algorithms.…”
Section: Topological Designs With Ground Element Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second question arises due to an opposition-based concept that could potentially improve the search performance of the evolutionary algorithm (EA) [4][5][6][7]; the multi-objective population-based incremental learning (MPBIL) was the best optimizer [8]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the opposition-based concept could improve population-based incremental learning (PBIL) performance for a single objective, which is called the opposition-based concept PBIL(OPBIL) [9], whereas the multi-objective optimization is called opposite-based, multi-objective, population-based incremental learning (OMPBIL) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase in crossover factor Cr, more changes are introduced into the new generation. The traditional method cannot guarantee precedence constraints; 25 this article proposes a new program to well inherit good structures from the target individual and to yield a better mutant individual, an improved crossover operator is given as follows(illustrated by an example in Table 6):…”
Section: Hdde Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pareto 前沿的智能正则约束法。罗震等 [9] 按经验法 给定各工况的权重系数,基于带权重的折衷规划法 (含有加权系数的 q 范数)和带惩罚的固体各向同性 材料插值法(Solid isotropic material with penalization for intermediate densities, SIMP)插值模型对多刚度 结构拓扑优化问题进行了研究。兰凤崇等 [10] 采用层 次分析法来确定各工况的最优权重系数,运用折衷 规划法构建综合目标函数,对多工况车身结构进行 了优化设计。张志飞等 [11] 以灰色综合关联分析确定 子目标的权重系数,以折衷规划法归一化子目标建 立综合目标函数,对多目标的汽车悬架控制臂进行 了优化研究。利用加权和方法进行优化,方法易于 实现,但是权重系数体现了各子目标在结构中的重 要性,不同的权重系数会得到不同的优化结果。目 前还没有系统确定各工况权重系数的方法 [10] ,如何 合理的选取权重系数仍待研究。 进化算法 [2,[12][13] 是另 一种常用的多目标优化问题求解方法。MADEIRA 等 [14] 和 CARDILLO 等 [15] 分别采用遗传算法对多刚 度 结 构 拓 扑 优 化 问 题 进 行 了 优 化 。 另 外 , …”
unclassified