2015
DOI: 10.3390/en8076962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Reservoir Optimization Balancing Energy Generation and Firm Power

Abstract: Abstract:To maximize annual power generation and to improve firm power are important but competing goals for hydropower stations. The firm power output is decisive for the installed capacity in design, and represents the reliability of the power generation when the power plant is put into operation. To improve the firm power, the whole generation process needs to be as stable as possible, while the maximization of power generation requires a rapid rise of the water level at the beginning of the storage period.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both the revenue from energy production and cost from energy purchase would affect the net revenue, determining the optimal levels of the two decision variables necessitates the analysis of their conflicting mechanisms from the background supports of reservoir operation. Previous studies [23,24] have noted that the maximization in total energy production is conflicted with the maximization of firm power output, due to difference between the mechanism of energy maximization and the mechanism of firm power output maximization. Specifically, the maximization in total energy production could result in heterogeneous power output when the peak power output is often produced at the highest water head, while the maximization in firm power output may yield homogenized power output sequences for maximizing the minimum power output over the planning horizon.…”
Section: Conflicting Decisions On Energy Production and Energy Purchasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both the revenue from energy production and cost from energy purchase would affect the net revenue, determining the optimal levels of the two decision variables necessitates the analysis of their conflicting mechanisms from the background supports of reservoir operation. Previous studies [23,24] have noted that the maximization in total energy production is conflicted with the maximization of firm power output, due to difference between the mechanism of energy maximization and the mechanism of firm power output maximization. Specifically, the maximization in total energy production could result in heterogeneous power output when the peak power output is often produced at the highest water head, while the maximization in firm power output may yield homogenized power output sequences for maximizing the minimum power output over the planning horizon.…”
Section: Conflicting Decisions On Energy Production and Energy Purchasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modeling process, the following equality and inequality constraints should be strictly satisfied to guarantee the safe operation of power system in the entire scheduling horizon [55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Operation Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After randomly generating the initial population in the search space, three basic evolutionary operators-the selection operator, crossover operator and mutation operator-are used to produce the new population composed of elite individuals. Moreover, using the fast sorting method and crowding distance strategy, all the Pareto solutions obtained at each cycle will be dynamically updated [38,39]. The iterative process will be not stopped until the terminal condition is met, then the final individuals represent the approximate optimal Pareto solutions.…”
Section: Overview Of Multi-objective Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%