2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimization of Additive Manufacturing Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the multiobjective one, it is desirable to produce a function comprised of performance parameters to be treated as variables that can address variations of all the parameters at the same time. New function will be treated as objective function for the job and the performance parameters act as function variables (Asadollahi-Yazdi, Gardan, and Lafon, 2018). After that, the process for the optimization remains the same (Guohua et al, 2013).…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization 54mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multiobjective one, it is desirable to produce a function comprised of performance parameters to be treated as variables that can address variations of all the parameters at the same time. New function will be treated as objective function for the job and the performance parameters act as function variables (Asadollahi-Yazdi, Gardan, and Lafon, 2018). After that, the process for the optimization remains the same (Guohua et al, 2013).…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization 54mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most optimization methods aim to maximize the quality of the surface but, as observed by Asadollahi-Yazdi et al [37], the user should obtain the surface quality in accordance to design specifications. In other words, at the end of the optimization process, the manufactured object should show that the surface quality requirements are satisfied.…”
Section: Build Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: With the aim to implement more reliable methods, Asadollahi-Yazdi et al [37] suggested evaluating build time and material directly from the set of command instructions given to the AM machine to realize the part. This approach, whose computation cost is enormous, cannot be based on simply reading the G-Code, but must take into account all that information, such as the jerk and acceleration laws, related to the specific machine [5].…”
Section: Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a competitive market of AM services, manufacturing costs must be estimated in a reliable way [6]- [8], which is why the accurate estimation of build times is crucial. A reliable quantification of build time also aids ascertainment of the deposition direction, which minimises the manufacturing costs [9]- [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%