2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Using MOGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANN and the regression model were used for surface roughness prediction in the AWJ cutting of AA 7075 aluminum alloy [ 9 ]. Additionally, different approaches have been applied for the investigation of surface roughness in the AWJ process, such as fuzzy logic in [ 10 ], the Taguchi-based analysis of variance method in [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) in [ 14 ], and the regression method in [ 10 , 15 ]. Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANN and the regression model were used for surface roughness prediction in the AWJ cutting of AA 7075 aluminum alloy [ 9 ]. Additionally, different approaches have been applied for the investigation of surface roughness in the AWJ process, such as fuzzy logic in [ 10 ], the Taguchi-based analysis of variance method in [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) in [ 14 ], and the regression method in [ 10 , 15 ]. Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [ 16 ] developed quadratic regression models to predict the penetration depth and surface roughness in abrasive water jet turning of alumina ceramics using a response surface methodology with a Box–Behnken design. Different kinds of materials were subjected to the AWJ process, among them, carbon steel S235 [ 14 ], Hardox steel [ 15 ], magnesium alloy [ 10 ], aluminum alloy [ 17 , 18 ], titanium alloy [ 19 ], marble [ 20 ], aluminum/magnesium hybrid metal matrix composites [ 11 ], a lanthanum phosphate/yttria composite [ 12 ], and Nimonic C236 superalloy [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Nandakumar, et al [97] has examined the nozzle head oscillating method in AWJ As illustrated in Figure 5, the waterjet pressure water travels at a high velocity and generates a Venturi effect or vacuum in the mixing chamber located beneath the orifice. A metered portion of abrasive particles enters through the abrasive inlet and is forced down with the waterjet stream in the mixing chamber [96]. The abrasive particles are mixed with the waterjet, creating an abrasive water jet.…”
Section: Nozzle Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nozzle is a vulnerable component of an abrasive waterjet machine and is commonly composed of silicon carbide, tungsten carbide cobalt, boron carbide, composite, and ceramic materials. Varied materials possess diverse properties that enable a nozzle to lengthen its utilization and wear [96]. In comparison to metals, ceramic nozzles (SiC, Al 2 O 3, ZrO 2, B 4 C and Si 2 N 4 ) are universally used in line with mechanical properties, maximum hardness, a high melting point, and lesser resistance to heat shock.…”
Section: Nozzle Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost of the material removal process is also an important aspect that should be taken into consideration, as it complies with one of the pillars of sustainability, namely the economic dimension. The total cost is calculated as the sum of five components, namely, the cost of abrasive particles, the cost of electric power, the cost of material, the cost of water, and the labor cost [53,54]: C total = C abr + C el + C mat + C wat + C labor (4) where Cabr = ca × ma × tm, C el = c e × P × tm, C mat = cm × MRR × ρ Ti × t m , C wat = c w × Q w × t m , and C labor = c l × t m . In the above equations, c a is the cost of abrasive per unit mass, which is equal to 3000 euro/tn in the case of garnet and 4000 euro/tn in the case of glass beads; t m is the machining time; c e is the cost of electricity, which is equal to 0.12 euro/kWh; c m is the cost of workpiece materials, which is equal to 45 euro/kg; ρ Ti is the density of titanium, equal to 4400 kg/m 3 ; c w is the cost of water, which is equal to 1.98 euro/m 3 ; and c l is the labor cost, equal to 8 euro/h.…”
Section: Sustainability Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%