Multi-Objective Optimal Capacity Planning for 100% Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Incorporating Cost of Demand-Side Flexibility Management

Abstract

The need for energy and environmental sustainability has spurred investments in renewable energy technologies worldwide. However, the flexibility needs of the power system have increased due to the intermittent nature of the energy sources. This paper investigates the prospects of interlinking short-term flexibility value into long-term capacity planning towards achieving a microgrid with a high renewable energy fraction. Demand Response Programs (DRP) based on critical peak and time-ahead dynamic pricing are compared for effective demand-side flexibility management. The system components include PV, wind, and energy storages (ESS), and several optimal component-sizing scenarios are evaluated and compared using two different ESSs without and with the inclusion of DRP. To achieve this, a multi-objective problem which involves the simultaneous minimization of the loss of power supply probability (LPSP) index and total life-cycle costs is solved under each scenario to investigate the most cost-effective microgrid planning approach. The time-ahead resource forecast for DRP was implemented using the scikit-learn package in Python, and the optimization problems are solved using the Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithm in MATLAB R . From the results, the inclusion of forecast-based DRP and PHES resulted in significant investment cost savings due to reduced system component sizing.Keywords: demand response program (DRP); photovoltaic system (PV); pumped heat energy storage (PHES); critical peak pricing (CPP) DRP; time-ahead dynamic pricing (TADP) DRP; loss of power supply probability (LPSP); energy storage system (ESS); Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO)

Demand response integration in microgrid planning as a strategy for energy transition in power systems

“…The results show an effective approach for least cost planning in microgrids (near 3%) by increasing to 100% the controllable load. In [85] a multi-objective approach is used taking into account cost management of flexibility: ESS and DR. The objective function is the minimization of the microgrid Life Cycle cost.…”

Data-driven optimal planning for hybrid renewable energy system management in smart campus: A case study

“…This situation implies that there is no constant supply of energy, and this leads to overall poor system performance when applied as standalone technologies [10]. Thus, most energy system design ensures planned coupling of renewable energy technologies with the already existing conventional energy supply and energy storage facilities as a backup for periods of insufficient and unreliable supply from the RERs technologies [11]. This approach solves the numerous problems associated with standalone renewable energy system configuration such as supply unreliability, poor power quality, high cost of/insufficient energy storage etc..…”

An Efficiency-Based Power Management Strategy for an Isolated Microgrid Project

“…In order to foster economy growth, it is vital to develop local microgrids capable of generating and distributing electricity in many contexts, such as islands, and remote areas. The same solution provides the additional opportunity to benefit from clean, renewable energy sources [6], [7]. A microgrid is typically made up of: i) renewable energy sources (solar, wind or biomass); ii) fossil fuel energy sources (conventional sources) to ensure grid stability; iii) energy storage solutions (batteries, hydrogen storage, mechanical storage, etc.…”