2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of chemical reactor design using computational fluid dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the global and local models are made use of for approximating the objective function and estimating the uncertainty of the approximated fitness, based on which an infill criterion is designed for surrogate management in the federated optimization environment. Federated data-driven optimization has a wide range real-world applications, in such as the design of chemical reactors [36] and the optimization of engineering operation [39], where the entire system contains a large number of sub-systems and the collected data on each sub-system are not allowed to be sent to a central storage. By extending FDD-EA, this work proposes a federated data-driven evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the global and local models are made use of for approximating the objective function and estimating the uncertainty of the approximated fitness, based on which an infill criterion is designed for surrogate management in the federated optimization environment. Federated data-driven optimization has a wide range real-world applications, in such as the design of chemical reactors [36] and the optimization of engineering operation [39], where the entire system contains a large number of sub-systems and the collected data on each sub-system are not allowed to be sent to a central storage. By extending FDD-EA, this work proposes a federated data-driven evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of a tube bundle design has not been exploited yet, except for tube arrangements in heat exchangers at low temperatures, e.g., Daróczy et al (2014). Considering multiple objectives, simulation-based optimization can yield a range of optimal solutions as for example Park et al (2018) showed for a stirred tank reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can address complex black-box problems, such as reactor geometry [16,17] or impeller configuration [18], but require a large number of function evaluations, which leads to a large number of computationally expensive CFD runs. To improve the computational efficiency of direct CFD simulations, hybrid methods have been proposed that replace direct CFD evaluation with simpler data-driven models [21][22][23][24][25], which are then integrated with GA. Successful implementation have been reported in the literature that use neural network [22,23], Gaussian process [24] and radial basis function (RBF) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the computational efficiency of direct CFD simulations, hybrid methods have been proposed that replace direct CFD evaluation with simpler data-driven models [21][22][23][24][25], which are then integrated with GA. Successful implementation have been reported in the literature that use neural network [22,23], Gaussian process [24] and radial basis function (RBF) [25]. However, building confidence in those data-driven models requires large number of CFD runs, and balancing computational efficiency with accuracy is non-trivial [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%