2002
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20020086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-model hierarchy approach to simulate barrel reactors for epitaxial silicon deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1D or 2D). The modeling procedure adopted here could be defined as multi-hierarchy and a detailed presentation of its development can be found in the literature [1][2][3]. Moreover, the models adopted here were well described in the literature and thus they will be only briefly summarized here [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Modeling Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1D or 2D). The modeling procedure adopted here could be defined as multi-hierarchy and a detailed presentation of its development can be found in the literature [1][2][3]. Moreover, the models adopted here were well described in the literature and thus they will be only briefly summarized here [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Modeling Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fixed temperature was imposed on the graphite susceptor and the temperatures of all the surfaces of the reactor were calculated solving the energy balance equation. However, model equations will be here omitted because well described in the literature [3,[10][11][12]. One of the main outcome of these simulations is the evolution of reactants concentrations due to the combination of mass transport, gas phase and surface reactions within the reactor and the resulting film growth rate.…”
Section: Fig 2 Reactor Geometry and Conditions Adopted In Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the reactor used for the simulations and the operating conditions adopted in the simulations, are sketched in Figure 2. Deposition on heated substrates was simulated using a combination of models of different complexity, ranging from the 1D representation to the 2D and 3D ones and thus adopting a so-called multi-hierarchy approach [3,10]. The gas phase species concentrations and the temperature profiles were determined through the solution of the mass, momentum and energy balance equations for a diluted gas mixture.…”
Section: Fig 2 Reactor Geometry and Conditions Adopted In Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former yields a stagnation flow, which, aside from unavoidable edge effects, is inherently scalable to large deposition areas. 2 Multi-hierarchy modeling procedure This aspect will be here only briefly summarized, since further details can be found elsewhere [6][7][8][9]. The models adopted to design the FACVD reactor were, in order of decreasing complexity, the following: (a) detailed 2D axial symmetric model, (b) one-dimensional simplified model (PFR), and (c) zero-dimensional model (CSTR).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pilot plant scale deposition reactor sketched in figure 1 was here designed through a multi-hierarchical modeling procedure [6], involving a series of models of increasing complexity. The advantage of this procedure is the very fast design of the main chamber dimensions as well as the definition of the process set point conditions before entering in the numerically heavier simulations that are here indeed dedicated to the nozzle design and the final verification of the whole system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%