2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14678-2_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-modal Validation Framework of Mitral Valve Geometry and Functional Computational Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was mounted in the extensively validated Georgia Tech Left Heart Simulator (GTLHS) and positioned to a healthy geometry using previously described methods. 9, 20, 24 To assess the positional tracking capacity of the new method, a dense marker mesh (target: 2 mm between markers) was attached across the annulus and both leaflets. This was imaged twice by μCT: first open and relaxed, then statically closed under steady systolic air pressure (120 mmHg), using recently developed methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was mounted in the extensively validated Georgia Tech Left Heart Simulator (GTLHS) and positioned to a healthy geometry using previously described methods. 9, 20, 24 To assess the positional tracking capacity of the new method, a dense marker mesh (target: 2 mm between markers) was attached across the annulus and both leaflets. This was imaged twice by μCT: first open and relaxed, then statically closed under steady systolic air pressure (120 mmHg), using recently developed methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was imaged twice by μCT: first open and relaxed, then statically closed under steady systolic air pressure (120 mmHg), using recently developed methods. 9 The air used to pressurize the model left ventricle was first humidified by passing through warm water; this prevented tissue dehydration during imaging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental protocols using Georgia Tech CLHS were extensively validated as described in our previous publications. 15,24,38 Briefly, we first simulated the healthy hemodynamic conditions of the end-systolic state (100 mmHg TVP) to recover the fully closed configuration of MV apparatus. Then, each valve was placed in the bore of a Siemens Inveon scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA) and imaged using the settings optimized for soft tissue imaging (80 kV energy, 500 μA intensity, 650 ms integration time).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%