2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja026309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐Instrumental Observation of Storm‐Induced Ionospheric Plasma Bubbles at Equatorial and Middle Latitudes

Abstract: June solstice is considered as a period with the lowest probability to observe typical equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) in the postsunset period. The severe geomagnetic storm on 22-23 June 2015 has drastically changed the situation. Penetrating electric fields associated with a long-lasting southward IMF support favorable conditions for postsunset EPBs generation in the dusk equatorial ionosphere for several hours. As a result, the storm-induced EPBs were progressively developed over a great longitudinal range… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b), whereas topside layers or radar plumes (seen in Fig. 2c) represent larger-scale elongated structures originating from bottom-side layers and extending to the topside ionosphere (Hysell and Burcham, 1998;Hysell, 2000;Chapagain et al, 2009;Chapagain, 2011). They are indicators of strong plasma plumes (Smith et al, 2016).…”
Section: Observations Of Ionospheric Irregularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b), whereas topside layers or radar plumes (seen in Fig. 2c) represent larger-scale elongated structures originating from bottom-side layers and extending to the topside ionosphere (Hysell and Burcham, 1998;Hysell, 2000;Chapagain et al, 2009;Chapagain, 2011). They are indicators of strong plasma plumes (Smith et al, 2016).…”
Section: Observations Of Ionospheric Irregularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical density irregularities within EPBs can have different scale sizes of several to hundreds of kilometers, and EPBs can cover a broad altitudinal range from the bottomside ionosphere up to ∼1,000 km (Cherniak et al, 2019;Lühr et al, 2014). Typical density irregularities within EPBs can have different scale sizes of several to hundreds of kilometers, and EPBs can cover a broad altitudinal range from the bottomside ionosphere up to ∼1,000 km (Cherniak et al, 2019;Lühr et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology and evolution processes of EPIs have been widely studied by using multi‐instrument measurements. For example, density irregularities are seen as airglow emission depletions in optical observations of ground‐based all‐sky imagers or space‐based ultraviolet imagers (Aa et al, ; Comberiate & Paxton, ; Kelley et al, ; Kil, Heelis, et al, ; Makela & Kelley, ; Martinis et al, ), plume‐like structures in radar backscatter measurements (Jin et al, ; Li et al, ; Woodman & La Hoz, ; Yokoyama & Fukao, ), range‐type equatorial spread‐F (ESF) echoes on ionograms (Abdu et al, ; Li et al, ), in situ plasma density depletions detected by Low‐Earth Orbiting (LEO) satellite observations (Aa et al, ; Basu et al, ; Cherniak et al, ; Huang et al, , ; Xiong et al, , ; Zakharenkova et al, ), and total electron content (TEC) depletions derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements (Aa et al, ; Blanch et al, ; Cherniak & Zakharenkova, ; Ma & Maruyama, ; Katamzi‐Joseph et al, ). Moreover, numerical models have also been used to study the triggering mechanisms of EPIs (e.g., Aveiro et al, ; Carter et al, ; Huba & Joyce, ; Huba et al, ; Krall et al, ; Retterer & Gentile, ; Yokoyama et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%