2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated Ground‐Based and Space‐Based Observations of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles

Abstract: This paper presents coordinated and fortuitous ground-based and spaceborne observations of equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) over the South American area on 24 October 2018, combining the following measurements: Global-scale Observations of Limb and Disk far ultraviolet emission images, Global Navigation Satellite System total electron content data, Swarm in situ plasma density observations, ionosonde virtual height and drift data, and cloud brightness temperature data. The new observations from the Global-scal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(162 reference statements)
12
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology and evolution processes of EPIs have been widely studied by using multi‐instrument measurements. For example, density irregularities are seen as airglow emission depletions in optical observations of ground‐based all‐sky imagers or space‐based ultraviolet imagers (Aa et al, ; Comberiate & Paxton, ; Kelley et al, ; Kil, Heelis, et al, ; Makela & Kelley, ; Martinis et al, ), plume‐like structures in radar backscatter measurements (Jin et al, ; Li et al, ; Woodman & La Hoz, ; Yokoyama & Fukao, ), range‐type equatorial spread‐F (ESF) echoes on ionograms (Abdu et al, ; Li et al, ), in situ plasma density depletions detected by Low‐Earth Orbiting (LEO) satellite observations (Aa et al, ; Basu et al, ; Cherniak et al, ; Huang et al, , ; Xiong et al, , ; Zakharenkova et al, ), and total electron content (TEC) depletions derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements (Aa et al, ; Blanch et al, ; Cherniak & Zakharenkova, ; Ma & Maruyama, ; Katamzi‐Joseph et al, ). Moreover, numerical models have also been used to study the triggering mechanisms of EPIs (e.g., Aveiro et al, ; Carter et al, ; Huba & Joyce, ; Huba et al, ; Krall et al, ; Retterer & Gentile, ; Yokoyama et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology and evolution processes of EPIs have been widely studied by using multi‐instrument measurements. For example, density irregularities are seen as airglow emission depletions in optical observations of ground‐based all‐sky imagers or space‐based ultraviolet imagers (Aa et al, ; Comberiate & Paxton, ; Kelley et al, ; Kil, Heelis, et al, ; Makela & Kelley, ; Martinis et al, ), plume‐like structures in radar backscatter measurements (Jin et al, ; Li et al, ; Woodman & La Hoz, ; Yokoyama & Fukao, ), range‐type equatorial spread‐F (ESF) echoes on ionograms (Abdu et al, ; Li et al, ), in situ plasma density depletions detected by Low‐Earth Orbiting (LEO) satellite observations (Aa et al, ; Basu et al, ; Cherniak et al, ; Huang et al, , ; Xiong et al, , ; Zakharenkova et al, ), and total electron content (TEC) depletions derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements (Aa et al, ; Blanch et al, ; Cherniak & Zakharenkova, ; Ma & Maruyama, ; Katamzi‐Joseph et al, ). Moreover, numerical models have also been used to study the triggering mechanisms of EPIs (e.g., Aveiro et al, ; Carter et al, ; Huba & Joyce, ; Huba et al, ; Krall et al, ; Retterer & Gentile, ; Yokoyama et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth rates of EPBs have been studied through data assimilation and modeling (Rajesh et al, 2017). Aa et al (2020) have reported coordinated ground and space-based observation of EPBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodman and La Hoz, 1976;Hysell et al, 1997;Fejer et al, 1999;Burke et al, 2003;Sripathi et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2015;Hickey et al, 2018;Aa et al, 2020). It should be noted that although ionospheric irregularities have been studied extensively, uncertainties still exist in understanding their evolution because of their varying scale with respect to size (Abdu, 2001;Sripathi et al, 2008;Aa et al, 2020). In this regard, different instruments are limited to observing ionospheric irregularities of specific sizes (Sripathi et al, 2008;Aa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%