2000 ASME Wind Energy Symposium 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi flexible body analysis for application to wind turbine control design

Abstract: A methodology is presented for the modeling of flexible horizontal-axis, wind-turbine systems. The multi-rigid-body portions of the system are modeled as a system of interconnected rigid bodies using Autolev, a symbolic manipulator ideally suited for dynamics of multi-rigid-body systems. The flexible portions of the wind-turbine system are represented as beam finite elements. Equations are presented for the beam element, and the choices of generalized coordinates and generalized speeds for the multi-rigid-body… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large portion of them were built on a displacement-based approach (Beheshti-Aval and Lezgy-Nazargah, 2012; Robbins and Reddy, 1991). An alternative approach is the intrinsic variable based mixed variational formulation (Hodges, 1990;Hodges and Patil, 2000;Yu and Blair, 2012), which treats force resultants and generalized strains as the primary unknowns rather than displacements or any other kinematic variables. The formulation renders a relatively more straightforward requirement for building a numerical solution scheme when geometrical nonlinearity is profound compared to the usual displacement-based approach (Yu and Blair, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large portion of them were built on a displacement-based approach (Beheshti-Aval and Lezgy-Nazargah, 2012; Robbins and Reddy, 1991). An alternative approach is the intrinsic variable based mixed variational formulation (Hodges, 1990;Hodges and Patil, 2000;Yu and Blair, 2012), which treats force resultants and generalized strains as the primary unknowns rather than displacements or any other kinematic variables. The formulation renders a relatively more straightforward requirement for building a numerical solution scheme when geometrical nonlinearity is profound compared to the usual displacement-based approach (Yu and Blair, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] Lee et al 14 performed the structure dynamic analysis of horizontal wind turbine with both rigid-and flexiblebody subsystems and analyzed the natural characteristics of this rigid-flexible coupling model. 15 The wind turbine drivetrain is operated with varying loads excitation. As a consequence, it can cause the gearbox to be more prone to failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical details were presented earlier in Ref. 12. Here we recapitulate the important steps in the derivation of the equations for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Treatment Of Flexible Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 As an intermediate step toward final realization of the methodology, here we propose a simplified analytical model, solution strategy, and numerical examples.…”
Section: Present Workmentioning
confidence: 99%