The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020 IEEE International Radar Conference (RADAR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/radar42522.2020.9114664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Feature Encoder for Radar-Based Gesture Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, although there're already methods considering using the 5D feature representation, such as 3D-CNN (MPCA) [22], 3D-CNN+LSTM [23] and 2D-CNN (multi-feature encoder) [22]. However, our methods outperform all of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, although there're already methods considering using the 5D feature representation, such as 3D-CNN (MPCA) [22], 3D-CNN+LSTM [23] and 2D-CNN (multi-feature encoder) [22]. However, our methods outperform all of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, our methods outperform all of these methods. The 3D-CNN (MPCA) only gets an accuracy of 90.22%, and this may be explained by that this method suffers from the high dimensionality of the extracted 5D feature tensor [22]. The 2D-CNN (multi-feature encoder) method gets an accuracy of 94.72% on the test dataset, 4.5% higher than that of 3D-CNN (MPCA), a little (0.4%) higher than that of 3D-CNN+LSTM, comparable with that of S3D (5D feature cubes), but still lower than that of our methods, such as S3D+STDC, S3D+ASTCAC and S3D+STDC+ASTCAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations