2019 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/globalsip45357.2019.8969135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Discriminator Distributed Generative Model for Multi-Layer RF Metasurface Discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generator takes as input a concatenation of 101 equally spaced spectral points between 400 and 800 nm of the optical response (R) and 411 Gaussian noise samples, for a total of 512 dimensional input. The choice of noise vectors for generative models 11,25,30 does not correlate with the data samples needed for the training, since the cGAN model learns the same probabilistic distribution of EM simulation datasets (see Supplementary Information Section VII). During training, G learns about the conditional probability distribution of Al-nanoantennae structural design space and produces a 2D cross sectional image given an optical response as input.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generator takes as input a concatenation of 101 equally spaced spectral points between 400 and 800 nm of the optical response (R) and 411 Gaussian noise samples, for a total of 512 dimensional input. The choice of noise vectors for generative models 11,25,30 does not correlate with the data samples needed for the training, since the cGAN model learns the same probabilistic distribution of EM simulation datasets (see Supplementary Information Section VII). During training, G learns about the conditional probability distribution of Al-nanoantennae structural design space and produces a 2D cross sectional image given an optical response as input.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DL is capable of uncovering complex relationships in data/signals and, thus, can achieve better performance. This has been demonstrated in several successful applications of DL in wireless communications problems such as channel estimation [31], [32], analog beam selection [33], [34], and also hybrid beamforming [33], [35]- [39]. In particular, DL-based techniques have been shown [32], [37], [38], [40], [41] to be computationally efficient in searching for optimum beamformers and tolerant to imperfect channel inputs when compared with the conventional methods,.…”
Section: Arxiv:191210036v1 [Eesssp] 20 Dec 2019mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The use of DNNs is expected to substantially reduce computational complexity and processing overhead since it only requires several layers of simple operations such as matrix-vector multiplications. Moreover, several successful DL applications have been demonstrated in wireless communications problems such as channel estimation [13]- [22], analog beam selection [23], [24], and hybrid beamforming [23], [25]- [29]. Besides, DL-based techniques, when compared with other conventional optimization methods, have been shown [14], [27], [28], [30] to be more computationally efficient in searching for beamformers and more tolerant to imperfect channel inputs.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%