2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for user satisfaction-induced demand-side load management for an institutional building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies using MCDA, the widely employed methods include the Best-Worst Method (BWM) [43][44][45], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [46][47][48], Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE)-I and II [49][50][51][52], VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [53][54][55], Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) [56,57], Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [58][59][60], and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) [61][62][63]. Further, the studies that deal with qualitative attributes utilize fuzzified MCDA approaches such as Fuzzy AHP [64,65], Fuzzy TOPSIS [66,67], and many others. All these MCDA methods can be typically categorized as value measurement models; goal, aspiration, and reference level models; and outranking models [68].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies using MCDA, the widely employed methods include the Best-Worst Method (BWM) [43][44][45], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [46][47][48], Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE)-I and II [49][50][51][52], VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [53][54][55], Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) [56,57], Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [58][59][60], and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) [61][62][63]. Further, the studies that deal with qualitative attributes utilize fuzzified MCDA approaches such as Fuzzy AHP [64,65], Fuzzy TOPSIS [66,67], and many others. All these MCDA methods can be typically categorized as value measurement models; goal, aspiration, and reference level models; and outranking models [68].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method yields quality judgements and effectively deals with the uncertainties involved ( Beikkhakhian, Javanmardi, Karbasian, & Khayambashi, 2015 ; Lima Junior et al, 2014 ) and has been implemented in many real-world practical cases. Fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is already applied in the domains of electric vehicles ( Rajak & Shaw, 2019 ), business ( Samaie, Meyar-Naimi, Javadi, & Feshki-Farahani, 2020 ), environmental analysis ( Onu, Quan, Xu, Orji, & Onu, 2017 ), demand-side management ( Madurai Elavarasan, Leoponraj, Vishnupriyan, Dheeraj, & Gangaram Sundar, 2021 ) and mobile health application ( Wu, Liu, & Liu, 2018 ). As a whole, this hybrid methodology of the SWOT-Fuzzy TOPSIS approach will highlight the best pathway to deal with the post-pandemic scenario to direct towards sustainable cities.…”
Section: An Indispensable Way To Sustainable Cities In the Post-pandemic Period: Swot-fuzzy Topsis Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two levels of user satisfaction are defined, i.e. time-based satisfaction and device-based satisfaction (Elavarasan et al, 2021). Time-based satisfaction refers to the satisfaction difference when using the same appliance during different time slots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%