2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria assessment approach for a residential building retrofit in Norway

Abstract: This paper presents a multi-criteria assessment approach for a wide range of energy efficient measures and their combinations applied for a residential building retrofit in Norway.A number of passive, active and renewable energy efficient measures (EEMs) have been selected and defined. Based on the level of energy saving potentials, these EEMs have been combined into 18 retrofit combination packages (COMBs) and grouped into various retrofit levels (Moderate Retrofit-I, II, III and Extensive Retrofit). The annu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the relevance of the solar/PV system as a relatively low-cost RES with a substantial reducing potential of environmental impact, this system is incorporated into all possible combinations. Therefore, 2 11 (2,048) possible combinations are considered in this study. The generated LCC profiles for LOP1, LOP2, LOP3 and LOP4 correspond with the trendline with an R 2 value of 0.8351, 0.7758, 0.8726, and 0.9053, respectively.…”
Section: Building Performance Based On the Combinatorial Retrofit Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given the relevance of the solar/PV system as a relatively low-cost RES with a substantial reducing potential of environmental impact, this system is incorporated into all possible combinations. Therefore, 2 11 (2,048) possible combinations are considered in this study. The generated LCC profiles for LOP1, LOP2, LOP3 and LOP4 correspond with the trendline with an R 2 value of 0.8351, 0.7758, 0.8726, and 0.9053, respectively.…”
Section: Building Performance Based On the Combinatorial Retrofit Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the universal concept of optimising the energy, environmental and economic (3E) variables is emphasised to promote the interpretability, applicability and comparability between outcomes [1,9,10]. Social variables of building retrofits, such as the best possible compromise to enhance thermal comfort and indoor air quality, are also commonly considered [8,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple additive weighting (SAW) was used in the selection from retrofit options for buildings in Norway using seven criteria (energy reduction, costs, payback period, CO 2 reduction, disturbance, indoor air quality, and aesthetics). That study took account of the different priorities of the occupants of the buildings, landlords and local government, with occupants' preferences different from the other two groups [137]. An interactive system for decision making for retrofitting, based on the "CommunityViz" ARCGIS extension (https://communityviz.city-explained.com/index.html) (accessed on 24 March 2021) was described by [138].…”
Section: Focus On Building Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the academic literature, conversion factors are used in a variety of applications. Most frequently, they are used to evaluate various building renovation scenarios or design options for newly-built projects [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In these cases, the primary energy use and CO 2 emissions are calculated for certain renovation measures or building designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%