2020
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2019.2931240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Channel and Multi-Model-Based Autoencoding Prior for Grayscale Image Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset of the defective image restoration network is also composed of the training set and test set; a total of 10,000 defective images and 10,000 true images are selected, with a total of 14,000 positive and negative samples [17], including 7,000 positive sample images and 7,000 negative sample images, where 70.00% of the prepared dataset (14,000 images) is used as the training set for the training of the image restoration algorithm. The remaining 30.00% (6000 images) of 3000 negative samples are used as test data to validate the effect of repairing the defective regions in this study [18]. For the 7000 negative samples in the training set of the restoration network 8…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset of the defective image restoration network is also composed of the training set and test set; a total of 10,000 defective images and 10,000 true images are selected, with a total of 14,000 positive and negative samples [17], including 7,000 positive sample images and 7,000 negative sample images, where 70.00% of the prepared dataset (14,000 images) is used as the training set for the training of the image restoration algorithm. The remaining 30.00% (6000 images) of 3000 negative samples are used as test data to validate the effect of repairing the defective regions in this study [18]. For the 7000 negative samples in the training set of the restoration network 8…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the approximate equivalence between problem (1) and (41) (see [50], [51]), in what follows, we illustrate the efficiency of our algorithm in approximating (41). Some recent methods for image restoration includes; multi-channel and multi-model based auto encoding prior for gray scale image restoration [52]; formatted learning for image restoration [53], image restoration by combined order regularization with optimal spatial adaptation [54], multi-Level encoder-decoder architectures for image restoration [55], riemannian loss for image restoration [56] and modulating image restoration with continual levels via adaptive feature modification layers [57].…”
Section: Application To Image Restoration Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be noted here that before the above method was proposed, the similar concept of plug and play was proposed in Reference [5], in which the half-quadratic splitting method (HQS) can be used in a variety of subproblems of image restoration. Some researchers have also proposed a denoising autoencoder based on a multichannel model and applied it to the restoration task of single-channel gray-scale infrared image [26]. In addition, there are also methods to apply the half-quadratic splitting method to image super-resolution task and achieve good results [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%