Outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks of infection related to bronchoscopy typically involve Gram-negative bacteria, Mycobacterium species or Legionella species. We report an unusual bronchoscopy-related pseudo-outbreak due to Actinomyces graevenitzii. Extensive epidemiological and microbiological investigation failed to identify a common source. Strain typing revealed that the cluster was comprised of heterogeneous strains of A. graevenitzii. A change in laboratory procedures for Actinomyces cultures was coincident with the emergence of the pseudo-outbreak, and we determined that A. graevenitzii isolates more readily adopted a white, dry, molar tooth appearance on anaerobic colistin nalidixic acid (CNA) agar which likely facilitated its detection and identification in bronchoscopic specimens. This unusual pseudo-outbreak was related to frequent requests of bronchoscopists for Actinomyces cultures combined with a change in microbiology laboratory practices.
Actinomyces graevenitzii is infrequently identified in clinical specimens, and its pathogenicity is not well defined. A. graevenitzii is a component of the oropharyngeal microbiota and has been reported to cause pneumonia, lung abscesses, osteitis of the jaw, and bacteremia (1-8). In early December 2013, an increase in the recovery of A. graevenitzii from specimens from patients who underwent bronchoscopy was noted by microbiology and infection control staff. Our investigation revealed that the cluster of A. graevenitzii isolates represented a pseudo-outbreak associated with a change in laboratory practices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Setting.A 1,500-bed tertiary care university-affiliated teaching hospital was the setting for this study.Epidemiological investigation. The microbiology laboratory's computerized database was queried to obtain the number of bronchoscopy cultures performed, the number of Actinomyces cultures ordered on bronchoscopy specimens, and the number of those cultures ordered that were positive for Actinomyces from January 2011 through December 2013. Medical records of patients whose bronchoscopy specimens yielded Actinomyces were reviewed, and the following variables were recorded: date of bronchoscopy, results of bronchoscopic specimen cultures for routine respiratory pathogens and for Actinomyces, bronchoscope used, bronchoscopist, endoscopy personnel involved in the procedure, procedure room number, and medications administered during bronchoscopy procedures. Only three bronchoscopes were routinely used, and almost all bronchoscopies were performed in procedure room 3. Therefore, we focused our investigation on room 3, the three bronchoscopes, and the "wash room" in which all bronchoscopes and endoscopes undergo highlevel disinfection using one of three automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) (DSDs Medivators, Minneapolis, MN). Findings of cytologic examination and bronchial biopsy specimens were also recorded.Environmental sources of samples collected for culture in the endoscopy suite included unopened bottles of lidocaine, atomizer, cotton ball...