2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-axial creep-fatigue life prediction considering history-dependent damage evolution: A new numerical procedure and experimental validation

Abstract: In this paper, a new numerical procedure based on a cycle-by-cycle analysis has been constructed for creep-fatigue behavior and life prediction of high-temperature structures under multi-axial stress states. Within this framework, a modified unified viscoplastic constitutive model with isotropic hardening and modified kinematic hardening rules is developed to simulate the cycle-by-cycle stress-strain responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure lives were predicted considering the damage accumulation under CFI, where the linear damage summation (LDS) method was employed to evaluate the total damage. The fatigue life was estimated by strain‐range partitioning (SRP), 38 frequency‐modified life (FML) equation, 39 damage function approach, 40,41 modified universal slope method (MUSM), and designed fatigue curve provided in ASME NH 42 . Whereas, the time fraction rule (TF), 43 ductility exhaustion method (DE), 43 and strain energy ductility exhaustion method (SEDE) 44,45 were developed to predict the creep damage, considering the absorbed internal energy density dominating the creep deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure lives were predicted considering the damage accumulation under CFI, where the linear damage summation (LDS) method was employed to evaluate the total damage. The fatigue life was estimated by strain‐range partitioning (SRP), 38 frequency‐modified life (FML) equation, 39 damage function approach, 40,41 modified universal slope method (MUSM), and designed fatigue curve provided in ASME NH 42 . Whereas, the time fraction rule (TF), 43 ductility exhaustion method (DE), 43 and strain energy ductility exhaustion method (SEDE) 44,45 were developed to predict the creep damage, considering the absorbed internal energy density dominating the creep deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) On the basis of the comprehensive review on notch effects in metal fatigue, some prospective aspects deserve further investigations summarized as below: (a) study the mechanism of notch fatigue failure from the macroscopic and microcosmic perspectives in combination with experiments, realize the modelling and evaluation of the overall damage of the notch, and characterize the contribution of different material blocks inside the effective damage region to the overall fatigue failure; (b) quick analytical calculation of local stress and strain in the notched region and its combination with methods for notch fatigue analysis to achieve convenient and efficient fatigue strength evaluation, as recent analyses based on FEA are generally inefficient; (c) establish a general analytical framework suitable for diversiform notch geometries and load types, further incorporating the influences of multiple factors such as multiaxial fatigue, creep, and size effect on fatigue strength of the interest; (d) build a database of notched fatigue test results, summing up the applicability of each method under different loading conditions or geometry cases, which facilitates communication and innovation among different methods. In particular, the coupling analysis of notch and size effects is the premise of achieving the extrapolation of fatigue strength of large‐scale components/structures using experimental data of small‐scale specimens collected in laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much attention was paid on the relationship between FSED and SEDR at a fixed temperature in the previous studies, where the CSED is a constant parameter. 20,22,51 Herein, a unified damage model considering various temperatures was developed to describe the temperature-dependent creep-free stage as follows:…”
Section: Creep-fatigue Life Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%