2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-attribute statistics histograms for accurate and robust pairwise registration of range images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further verify our pairwise registration, two criteria are employed for quantitative assessment of registration's results, i.e., the rotation error θ r and the translation error θ t which are used in [15], [34]. θ r represents error between the ground truth rotation matrix R GT and the actual matrix R A .…”
Section: Experiments Of Pairwise Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further verify our pairwise registration, two criteria are employed for quantitative assessment of registration's results, i.e., the rotation error θ r and the translation error θ t which are used in [15], [34]. θ r represents error between the ground truth rotation matrix R GT and the actual matrix R A .…”
Section: Experiments Of Pairwise Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above feature descriptors are invariant to translation and rotation, but are still sensitive to noise [8], so it is hard to find correct correspondences by using them. In recent years, people have also put forward some local feature descriptors such as point feature histogram (PFH) [9], rotational projection statistics (RoPS) [10]- [13], signature of histogram of orientations (SHOT) [14], multi-attribute statistics histograms (MaSH) [15], local feature statistic histogram (LFSH) [16], binary shape context descriptor [17], [18], voxel-based buffer-weighted binary descriptor [19], 3D descriptor with global structural frames and local signatures of histograms [20], signature of geometric centroids descriptor [21], etc. These local feature descriptors have a certain improvement on finding correct point-to-point correspondences in noisy point clouds, and outperform global feature descriptors in pairwise registration of point clouds.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the strategy S1, a support radius for calculating the direction of LRA is fixed to 20 mesh resolution (hereinafter mr which is computed as the average distance between neighbor points in this paper.) with referring to [12,31], and a support radius used for eliminating sign ambiguity increases from 3 mr to 20 mr with a step of 1 mr. In the strategy S2, the support radii of calculating the direction and eliminating sign ambiguity are simultaneously increased from 3 mr to 20 mr with a step of 1 mr. (a) Tested on B3R dataset with the combination of Gaussian noise and varying mesh resolutions.…”
Section: Local Reference Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we evaluate the performance of our SDASS descriptor in the application of 3D matching, and compared with the ten feature descriptors (including SI, SHOT, RoPS, TriSI, LFSH, TOLDI, SI+LMA, SHOT+LMA, LFSH+LMA and SDASS+Yang). The performance of these descriptors in 3D matching are evaluated by the percentage of correct correspondences (PCC) [31]. Specifically, we first randomly sample some key points on scene and 1000 key points on model.…”
Section: Applications To 3d Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it solves the local minimum problem, it is still sensitive to the initialization. A coarse-to-fine strategy [10,11] is presented, where the coarse registration provides an initial estimation for the fine registration to obtain a precise alignment. This strategy can accurately register point clouds without initialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%