2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent consensus with diverse time-delays and jointly-connected topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the proof of Theorem 1, there must exist K and T satisfying (9) if and only if (A, B) is stabilisable and G has a spanning tree. The difficulty of Theorem 9 is the calculation of e AT and T 0 e Az dz, which can be solved by some softwares, such as Matlab.…”
Section: Protocol Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By the proof of Theorem 1, there must exist K and T satisfying (9) if and only if (A, B) is stabilisable and G has a spanning tree. The difficulty of Theorem 9 is the calculation of e AT and T 0 e Az dz, which can be solved by some softwares, such as Matlab.…”
Section: Protocol Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [28][29][30], the switching communication topologies were assumed to be governed by continuous-time homogeneous Markov processes, whose state space corresponds to the communication patterns. The authors of [31][32][33] considered continuous-time multi-agent systems under jointly connected topologies, which had less constraints on each possible topology. However, these results are quite conservative in the sense that the underlying topology of the system switches without concerning the current states of the multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early pioneering works ( ( ), ( )), Vicsek et al proposed a simple model of autonomous agents, and Olfati et al established a framework of consensus control for the first-order integrators with different topologies. Since then, many results have been done under different conditions such as finite-time consensus ( ( ), ( ), ( )), quantized Kashyap et al 2007Carli & Bullo 2009Zhu & Martinez 2011Wang & Slotine 2006Lin & Jia 2011Wen et al 2013bYu et al 2013Hu 2011Chen et al 2014Wen et al 2012Yu et al 2010Li et al 2010Li et al 2013Wang et al 2013Diao et al 2014Mei et al 2011Zhao et al 2014Hong et al 2008 Peng & Yang 2009 Hu 2011 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%