2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles based on chitosan grafted with various non-ionic polymers: Synthesis, structural characterisation and diffusion studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with available literature, it is difficult to conclude the driving factors behind the enhanced propulsion experienced by our coated microparticles. A lot of studies done investigating PEG and chitosan involved nanoparticles 32 , 40 , which are orders of magnitude smaller, and other literature involves experimental studies that cannot be directly related to our work 33 . Based on what we do know, it seems likely that molecular weight is a driving factor in mucin interactions, with electrostatic interactions also having some contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with available literature, it is difficult to conclude the driving factors behind the enhanced propulsion experienced by our coated microparticles. A lot of studies done investigating PEG and chitosan involved nanoparticles 32 , 40 , which are orders of magnitude smaller, and other literature involves experimental studies that cannot be directly related to our work 33 . Based on what we do know, it seems likely that molecular weight is a driving factor in mucin interactions, with electrostatic interactions also having some contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to conclude an exact relationship between chemical coatings and improved propulsion behavior; we speculate from literature that these interactions are the result of molecular weight and electrostatic force differences between different coatings. In addition, we believe that unexplored physiochemical interactions between active microparticles and mucin glycoproteins are heavily contributing to these results and make it difficult for effective comparisons with studies involving passive nanoparticles 32 , 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a solution, antiadhesive nanoparticles weakly interact with the mucus layer: although this property increases the quantity of nanoparticles lost in the digestive and respiratory systems post-administration, it increases nanoparticle diffusion rate across mucus. For this reason, antiadhesive nanoparticles have also been proposed for IN drug delivery [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Biomaterials-based Vehicles For In Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ways et al investigated the possibility to create mucus-inert chitosan nanoparticles through grafting with PEG, PHEA, POZ and PVP. All the modified nanocarriers showed superior mucus penetration compared to unmodified chitosan with PVP showing the highest penetration depth in ex vivo sheep nasal mucosa [ 48 ].…”
Section: Biomaterials-based Vehicles For In Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research studies concentrate on composite materials, including chitosan and other components such as biological species [ 85 , 86 ], metals [ 87 , 88 , 89 ], synthetic polymers [ 90 , 91 , 92 ], and others. A foam complex between negatively charged DNA and cationic chitosan was studied as a functional material for drug delivery [ 93 ].…”
Section: Chitosanmentioning
confidence: 99%