2019
DOI: 10.2174/1573395514666180605092054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal Vaccine Approaches for Prevention of HIV and SIV Transmission

Abstract: Optimal protective immunity to HIV will likely require that plasma cells, memory B cells and memory T cells be stationed in mucosal tissues at portals of viral entry. Mucosal vaccine administration is more effective than parenteral vaccine delivery for this purpose. The challenge has been to achieve efficient vaccine uptake at mucosal surfaces, and to identify safe and effective adjuvants, especially for mucosally administered HIV envelope protein immunogens. Here, we discuss strategies used to deliver potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 386 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, TLR7/8 reinforces T cell and B cell immune responses. Vaccination with the stable forms of the virosomal HIV-1 candidate vaccine should elicit relevant protective antibodies, even if the product has been stored accidentally for a few days or weeks at 40 °C or frozen during shipment [ 57 , 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Different Types Of Virosome-based Viral Nanovaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, TLR7/8 reinforces T cell and B cell immune responses. Vaccination with the stable forms of the virosomal HIV-1 candidate vaccine should elicit relevant protective antibodies, even if the product has been stored accidentally for a few days or weeks at 40 °C or frozen during shipment [ 57 , 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Different Types Of Virosome-based Viral Nanovaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, mucosal vaccines are superior to other vaccination strategies [ 40 ], which provides the active combat zone of defense for pathogens with mucosal initial site of entry (oral and nasal routes) [ 45 , 50 ]. Since the composition of innate cells with particular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) is diverse in mucosal and systemic tissues, administration of the same antigen/adjuvant or the same vaccine in various routes would lead to utterly different efficiency [ 51 , 52 ]. In this regard, Pederson et al compared the intranasal and intramuscular inoculation of a candidate influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Mucosal Immunization Vs Conventional Parenteral Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, distinct vaccination routes, oral, nasal, sublingual, rectal or vaginal, stimulate mucosal immunity in different locations (1,2). Furthermore, without an adequate adjuvant, vaginal immunization generally fails to stimulate robust vaginal antigen-specific antibody responses (3)(4)(5). It is only in cases where the antigen itself also acts as an adjuvant, such as cholera toxin B (6)(7)(8), or HIV-gp41 virosomes (9), that vaginal immunization allows the induction of stronger antigen-specific mucosal IgG and IgA responses than parenteral vaccination or immunization at other mucosal sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%