2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal IgA responses in influenza virus infections; thoughts for vaccine design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While both vaccines elicited humoral responses in the ferrets, only LAIV provided protection from respiratory challenge with a live heterologous influenza virus. Potential mechanisms of sIgA protection may include blocking of viral host cell attachment at the site of initial mucosal infection, intracellular uptake of sIgA with blocking of viral uncoating, or redirection for uptake of influenza virus particles by respiratory macrophages or other phagocytes that can mediate intracellular killing and inhibition of influenza virus replication (27). These protective mechanisms afforded by LAIV may explain the beneficial effects of LAIV vaccination in adults despite the absence of serum HAI responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both vaccines elicited humoral responses in the ferrets, only LAIV provided protection from respiratory challenge with a live heterologous influenza virus. Potential mechanisms of sIgA protection may include blocking of viral host cell attachment at the site of initial mucosal infection, intracellular uptake of sIgA with blocking of viral uncoating, or redirection for uptake of influenza virus particles by respiratory macrophages or other phagocytes that can mediate intracellular killing and inhibition of influenza virus replication (27). These protective mechanisms afforded by LAIV may explain the beneficial effects of LAIV vaccination in adults despite the absence of serum HAI responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parenteral vaccination induces serum IgG but not S-IgA, so vaccine efficacy is limited. In contrast, intranasal administration of an inactivated influenza vaccine elicits both S-IgA and IgG responses, thus improving the protective efficacy of current vaccination procedures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunization against influenza encompasses different kinds of immunity such as homologous protection (from strains included in the annually newly composed flu vaccines, e.g., H1N1) and cross-protection, with the later including homosubtypic protection against changing viruses (e.g., H1N2) and heterosubtypic protection (against different types of the virus, such as H3N2, or H5N1). 16 Mucosal IgA is also more cross-reactive and provides some protection against drift-and shift virus variants. 1 In particular, nasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is efficious even against strains not included, providing heterologous immunity, possibly mediated by mucosal IgA or cytotoxic T lymphocytes.…”
Section: Cross-protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%