2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal adjuvants

Abstract: Induction of immune responses following oral immunization is frequently dependent upon the co-administration of appropriate adjuvants that can initiate and support the transition from innate to adaptive immunity. The three bacterial products with the greatest potential to function as mucosal adjuvants are the ADP-ribosylating enterotoxins (cholera toxin and the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli), synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing unmethylated CpG dinucleotides (CpG ODN), and monophosphoryl l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
163
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
2
163
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…LT derivatives are known to elicit balanced Th1/Th2 immune responses, whereas CT derivatives clearly favor Th2-biased responses (14). Our data show that mice immunized with LT4 favored a type 1-biased immune response when compared with mice immunized with LT1 and LTK4R, suggesting that amino acid residues at other positions, either at the A or B subunits, play a relevant role on the immunomodulatory properties of LT. A better understanding of the impact associated with specific residues involved in the immunomodulatory role of LT, as well as in inhibition of NF-B production (49), will certainly help gain knowledge of the molecular mechanisms associated with the adjuvant effects of these molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LT derivatives are known to elicit balanced Th1/Th2 immune responses, whereas CT derivatives clearly favor Th2-biased responses (14). Our data show that mice immunized with LT4 favored a type 1-biased immune response when compared with mice immunized with LT1 and LTK4R, suggesting that amino acid residues at other positions, either at the A or B subunits, play a relevant role on the immunomodulatory properties of LT. A better understanding of the impact associated with specific residues involved in the immunomodulatory role of LT, as well as in inhibition of NF-B production (49), will certainly help gain knowledge of the molecular mechanisms associated with the adjuvant effects of these molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Co-administration of LT with antigens results in increased production of antigen-specific mucosal (IgA) and systemic (IgG) antibodies as well as activation of T lymphocytes (11,12). To avoid the mucosal toxicity exhibited by the native toxin, different LT mutants with reduced toxic effect but partially preserved adjuvanticity were tested in the murine model (13,14). Among the several LT mutants generated under laboratory conditions, LTK63 and LTR72, with no or drastically reduced enzymatic activity, and LTR192G, lacking the trypsin cleavage site, have been intensively investigated as potential mucosal adjuvants in the mouse model (8,9,15).…”
Section: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (Etec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the immunity occurred later than after the administration of a strain with colonizing factors F18ac in our previous experiments where piglets were protected against challenge with F18 positive ETEC on day 7 after combined immunization. It was proved in the second experiment when the infection with ETEC strain was performed on the third day after wean- It is likely that LT has adjuvant properties similarly like cholera toxin (Clements et al, 1988;Cheng et al, 1999;Freytag and Clements, 2005). The strain used in the present study did not produce LT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…No synergy between fluticasone and SLiT was observed in humans when using distinct administration routes. activity) 49,50 (Table 1). These toxins were either co-administered, conjugated or fused with allergens.…”
Section: Systemic Sublingualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These toxins were either co-administered, conjugated or fused with allergens. 49,50 TLR2 (e.g., Pam3CSK4) or TLR4 ligands (e.g., MPL and OM-294-BA-MP) were shown to strengthen Th1 and T Reg responses when used as adjuvants via the nasal or sublingual routes. [51][52][53][54] Similarly, dexamethasone associated with 1.25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 enhanced the efficacy of SLIT in a murine asthma model following induction of interleukin 10 production by immune cells, including dendritic cells and CD4 + T lymphocytes.…”
Section: Systemic Sublingualmentioning
confidence: 99%