2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosa-associated microbiota signature in colorectal cancer

Abstract: The aim of this study was to explore the gut microbiota profiles of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to examine the relationship between gut microbiota and other key molecular factors involved in CRC tumorigenesis. In this study, a 16S rDNA sequencing platform was used to identify possible differences in the microbiota signature between CRC and adjacent normal mucosal tissue. Differences in the microbiota composition in different anatomical colorectal tumor sites and their potential association with KRAS m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
9
83
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the tumour genera of (possible) oral origin identi ed in our study, were associated with tumour mucosa previously, namely Fusobacterium, Campylobacter, Leptotrichia, Parvimonas, Gemella, Granulicatella, Eikenella, Selenomonas, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Alloprevotella, Veilonella, Haemophilus [8,31,32,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. In contrast, Solobacterium was reported increased [31], while Slackia and Pseudomonas were shown to be decreased [12,19] in fecal samples of CRC patients compared to healthy donors, and, in one epidemiological study, the presence of Treponema in the oral cavity was associated with increased risk of CRC [29], but none of these were previously associated with tumour mucosa.…”
Section: Tumour Crc Microbial Subtypessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Some of the tumour genera of (possible) oral origin identi ed in our study, were associated with tumour mucosa previously, namely Fusobacterium, Campylobacter, Leptotrichia, Parvimonas, Gemella, Granulicatella, Eikenella, Selenomonas, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Alloprevotella, Veilonella, Haemophilus [8,31,32,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. In contrast, Solobacterium was reported increased [31], while Slackia and Pseudomonas were shown to be decreased [12,19] in fecal samples of CRC patients compared to healthy donors, and, in one epidemiological study, the presence of Treponema in the oral cavity was associated with increased risk of CRC [29], but none of these were previously associated with tumour mucosa.…”
Section: Tumour Crc Microbial Subtypessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, and other opportunistic bacteria were enriched at the cancer sites. 20,21 Previous studies have investigated that the presence of fecal Bacteroidaceae, Fusobacteriaceae (i.e., Fusobacterium), Peptostreptococcaceae and Porphyromonas was relatively abundant in CRC patients. 22 Hypothetically, tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues exhibit a better correlation A B C Figure 9 Diversity comparison of microbiota assemblage among CRC patients with S1, S2, and S3 staging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies show that Fusobacterium is more abundant in the intestines of CRC patients compared to the healthy individuals [32,33,36,38,42,45,46]. Comparation between CRC tissues and adjacent noncancer tissues also reveals that Fusobacterium is more abundant in the CRC tissues (Table 2) [ 30,36,37,43,44]. These studies indicate that there is a close relationship between Fusobacterium and CRC development.…”
Section: Porphyromonasmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is enriched in CRC and oral cancer patients, with its abundance in the intestines of CRC patients being higher than in healthy individuals [33,45,46]. In the CRC patients, Parvimonas exhibits higher abundance in CRC tissues compared to adjacent non-cancer tissues (Table 2) [30,44].…”
Section: Parvimonasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation