International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing With Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ispa.2010.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MTTF of Composite Web Services

Abstract: Although the reliability of the composition of web services has attracted much research works about it, but an important facet of it -MTTF (Meantime to Failure) has not been given enough considerations. The research presented in this paper intends to fill this gap by illustrating on an example of composite web service how the redundant system works and what kinds of practical results can be derived. The main contributions of this work includes: First, provide the concept of MTTF of composite web service, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the same values of MTTF and MTTR [6,8] are assumed for the HW and OS elements of the nodes subsystem, Table 3 only includes the parameter values for the KVM and NC blocks [32,33]. Model analysis of this subsystem produced an MTTF of 481.82 hours and an MTTR of 0.91 hours.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the same values of MTTF and MTTR [6,8] are assumed for the HW and OS elements of the nodes subsystem, Table 3 only includes the parameter values for the KVM and NC blocks [32,33]. Model analysis of this subsystem produced an MTTF of 481.82 hours and an MTTR of 0.91 hours.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I presents the values of mean time to failure (MTTF) and mean time to repair (MTTR) used in the GC model. Those values were obtained from [22] [23], and were used to compute the dependability metrics for the non-redundant general controller, and subsequently for the whole system. This subsystem has an MTTF of 180.72 h and an MTTR of 0.96 h. Figure 5 shows the RBD model that represents one node in the Nodes subsystem.…”
Section: A Model For Non-redundant Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nodes subsystem model assumes that the hardware and operating system of the nodes has the same dependability characteristics as the General Controller, i.e., the same MTTF and MTTR. Therefore, Table II presents only the parameter values for the KVM and NC blocks [22] [23]. The analysis of this model provides an MTTF of 481.82 hours and an MTTR of 0.91 hours for each node in this cloud environment.…”
Section: A Model For Non-redundant Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenarios 2a and 2b adopt the Erlang probability distribution. Scenarios 1a and 2a consider the MTTF and MTTR values obtained in (Dantas et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2009;Hu et al, 2010) reduced by a factor of 1000. Scenarios 1b and 2b use MTTR values which are 20% higher than those values adopted in Scenarios 1a and 2a.…”
Section: Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%