2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.17.448745
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mRNA- and factor-driven dynamic variability controls eIF4F-cap recognition for translation initiation

Abstract: mRNA 5′ cap recognition by eIF4F is a key step in eukaryotic translational control. While different mRNAs respond differently to eIF4F–directed regulation, the molecular basis for this variability remains unclear. We developed single-molecule fluorescence assays to directly observe eIF4F–mRNA interactions. We uncovered a complex interplay of mRNA features with factor activities that differentiates cap recognition between mRNAs. eIF4E–cap association rates are anticorrelated with mRNA length. eIF4A leverages AT… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 93 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a critical distinction between the nonspecific interactions of eIF4G with mRNA and the stronger and specific interactions with various IRESs. Single-molecule fluorescence assays and RIP-seq experiments indicate that eIF4G orthologs bind nonspecifically and dynamically with mRNA ( 163–165 ). In contrast, the interactions of eIF4G and DAP5 with IRESs are structure- and/or sequence-specific, suggesting that common structural folds in RNA could dictate the interactions ( 59 , 132 , 160 , 166–171 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a critical distinction between the nonspecific interactions of eIF4G with mRNA and the stronger and specific interactions with various IRESs. Single-molecule fluorescence assays and RIP-seq experiments indicate that eIF4G orthologs bind nonspecifically and dynamically with mRNA ( 163–165 ). In contrast, the interactions of eIF4G and DAP5 with IRESs are structure- and/or sequence-specific, suggesting that common structural folds in RNA could dictate the interactions ( 59 , 132 , 160 , 166–171 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%