2007
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.2267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI in the Histologic Characterization of Testicular Neoplasms

Abstract: Our study shows that MRI provides a credible preoperative differentiation of seminomatous from nonseminomatous testicular tumors, with excellent interobserver agreement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7] The MR criteria used to characterize testicular neoplasms were similar to those presented in the literature, including the presence of a mainly hypointense or a heterogeneous mass lesion on T2-weighted images, inhomogeneously enhancing after contrast material administration. [4][5][6][7]26,27 The coexistence of areas of hemorrhage or necrosis, invasion of testicular tunicae, and extension of the tumor to the paratesticular space and/or the spermatic cord confirmed the diagnosis of malignancy, as it was subsequently proved on histopathology. Although the same group of authors reported the absence of contrast material enhancement as the most sensitive sign in predicting the benign nature of an intratesticular lesion, this study had two false positives, detected as heterogeneously enhancing masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7] The MR criteria used to characterize testicular neoplasms were similar to those presented in the literature, including the presence of a mainly hypointense or a heterogeneous mass lesion on T2-weighted images, inhomogeneously enhancing after contrast material administration. [4][5][6][7]26,27 The coexistence of areas of hemorrhage or necrosis, invasion of testicular tunicae, and extension of the tumor to the paratesticular space and/or the spermatic cord confirmed the diagnosis of malignancy, as it was subsequently proved on histopathology. Although the same group of authors reported the absence of contrast material enhancement as the most sensitive sign in predicting the benign nature of an intratesticular lesion, this study had two false positives, detected as heterogeneously enhancing masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Intratesticular malignancies were diagnosed using the MR criteria known from previously published reports. 7,26,27 Testicular carcinomas were detected as either of low (n59) or heterogeneous (n55) signal intensity on T2-weighted images, with areas of hemorrhage (n55) or necrosis (n55), all heterogeneously enhancing after contrast material administration (Figures 2 Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of scrotal diseases AC Tsili et al 650 and 3). There was also invasion of the testicular tunicae by the neoplasm in two cases, invasion of the epididymis in one case and extension of the tumor to the spermatic cord in three patients ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scrotal MR imaging facilitates differentiation between benign and malignant lesions with high accuracy (3). On the basis of recent data, investigators have suggested that MR imaging findings could be closely correlated with the histologic characteristics of testicular neoplasms, providing a preoperative classification of the histologic type of testicular tumors (4). MR imaging is also highly accurate in the differentiation of extratesticular from intratesticular disease (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 When US gives confusing information due to altering echogenicity, MRI could play a complementary role in such cases. 11,12 In our case MRI was the most useful tool for differentiating the scrotal structures clearly so providing an anatomical road map for surgery. Although seminal vesicle attachment could not be exhibited exactly but intrapelvic extension has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%