MRI clasification in developmental dysplasia of the hip with reference to soft tissue changes /Gelisimsel kalca displazisinde yumusak doku degisiklikleri dikkate alinarak yapilan MRG siniflamasi

Pazarci, Ozhan; Bulut, Okay; Kılınç, Seyran; Gölge, Umut Hatay; Öztemür, Zekeriya

doi:10.5455/jtomc.2016.03.038

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In these three patients, development of AVN was thought to be associated with improper position of the hip inside the plaster, compulsive manipulations during reduction, and vein injuries during surgical treatment 16,17,18 Performing MRI in every case with DDH may be costly 1,11 because although it is relatively cheaper in our country than in others, MRI is the most expensive imaging method among those used for DDH cases 10 . However, the data it provides is very valuable, and its area of usage in DDH is increasing 20,21,22 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Performing MRI in every case with DDH may be costly 1,11 because although it is relatively cheaper in our country than in others, MRI is the most expensive imaging method among those used for DDH cases 10 . However, the data it provides is very valuable, and its area of usage in DDH is increasing 20,21,22 . MRI is useful in DDH because it enables comprehensive evaluations of the hip, requires no anesthesia, and does not emit ionizing radiation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

MRI assessment of DDH after reduction

Pazarci

Bulut²,

Tezeren³

et al. 2017

Cumhuriyet Medical Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYObjective: In this study, the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after reduction was examined. Method: Forty-two hips of 31 patients treated between 2003 and 2012 were examined prospectively. The femur head and acetabulum interaction were examined by MRI performed postreduction. Results: The average follow-up period was 40.47 ± 36.52 months. Eleven, 10 and 10 patients were diagnosed as bilateral (B), right (R) sided and left (L) sided, respectively. The average age on MRI was 13.1 months (min, 5; max, 24). MRI was obtained without sedation, except in three patients. The mean MRI duration was 5.21 min (range, 3.55-10.50 min). Concentric reduction was monitored in 19 hips of 15 patients. Postreduction redislocation was monitored in eight hips of six patients. Conclusions: MRI was beneficial in DDH because it was able to assess the hip extensively, did not require anesthesia, and did not use radiation. MRI provided advanced structural information that enabled the assessment of potential prevention of reduction. MRI was found to be an effective treatment scheduling method for DDH at an early period postreduction. MRI should be used more commonly in DDH.

show abstract