2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01223.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI assessment of liver iron content in thalassamic patients with three different protocols: comparisons and correlations

Abstract: Our aim was to assess liver iron content, in thalassaemic patients, by using three different MR protocols and compare their data. Ninety-four thalassaemic patients (44 M and 50 F, mean age 25.82 +/- 8.3 yrs), were enrolled in the study. In each patient, three measurements of the liver iron content were performed, with the use of a single imager, equipped with a 1.5 Tesla magnet. Liver R2* was measured on gradient-echo sequence. Calculation of MR-HIC values was based on an algorithm using liver to muscle (L/M) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current limitations of this methodology include lack of standardisation, interference due to external magnetic properties and an inability to quantify iron burden in heavily iron overloaded patients (dry weight >25mg/g) [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current limitations of this methodology include lack of standardisation, interference due to external magnetic properties and an inability to quantify iron burden in heavily iron overloaded patients (dry weight >25mg/g) [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of Liver T2* measurements against biopsy determined LIC has been documented by several groups [7][8][9][10][11] however there appears to be limited concordance between the studies. It has been hypothesised that inherent limitations of earlier MRI acquisition techniques, lack of methodology standardisation or sampling bias may have contributed to these inconsistencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be crucial when therapeutic decisions are based on the results from noninvasive hepatic iron quantification. Christoforidis et al compared the data of three different MR protocols (R2* relaxometry with gradient-echo sequences, SIR method and R2) in the assessment of liver iron content [17]. A good correlation between liver R2* and R2 measurement (r = 0.886) and between the R2 and the SIR method (r = 0.927) was found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LIC overestimation, particularly in the range around 80 µmol/g (4.5 mg/g) that is important for treatment management, will often result in overtreatment. Deviations of the method publicized by Gandon from R 2 *-based methods were also observed [31,42]. Gandon's method is limited to a maximum liver iron content of 350 µmol/g (20 mg/g) which is often exceeded particularly in patients receiving regular transfusions.…”
Section: Signal-intensity Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, an adequate analy-sis method with consideration of the liver fat content has only been insufficiently evaluated to date. The analysis of signal ratios between the liver and reference tissue according to Gandon [19] is apparently problematic [31,41,42]. A further approach introduced by Alustiza that also uses the signal ratio [18] has received little attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%