1994
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880040615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR measurement of pulsatile pressure gradients

Abstract: A magnetic resonance (MR) imaging method for evaluating pulsatile pressure gradients in laminar blood flow is presented. The technique is based on an evaluation of fluid shear and inertial forces from cardiac-gated phase-contrast velocity measurements. The technique was experimentally validated by comparing MR and manometer pressure gradient measurements performed in a pulsatile flow phantom. Analyses of random noise propagation and sampling error were performed to determine the precision and accuracy of the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18,29 The Navier-Stokes equation is an experimentally established method used to calculate the pressure gradient. Its accuracy was reported at better than 8% in model vessel segments, 30 and a high correlation coefficient was determined by invasive measurement methods using manometers in a pulsatile flow phantom. 28 Thus, we speculated that heterogeneous membrane tension would cause variability of the velocity and pressure gradient along the diameter of the tube in each ROI in the phantom experiment and that bifurcation in the Y-shaped connectors would cause turbulent flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…17,18,29 The Navier-Stokes equation is an experimentally established method used to calculate the pressure gradient. Its accuracy was reported at better than 8% in model vessel segments, 30 and a high correlation coefficient was determined by invasive measurement methods using manometers in a pulsatile flow phantom. 28 Thus, we speculated that heterogeneous membrane tension would cause variability of the velocity and pressure gradient along the diameter of the tube in each ROI in the phantom experiment and that bifurcation in the Y-shaped connectors would cause turbulent flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At present, it is impossible to measure these characteristics non-invasively. Two possibilities exist for obtaining these descriptors of the hemodynamic forces in a specific arterial segment of an individual patient based on non-invasive measurements: either deriving them directly from the measured velocity field (16)(17)(18), or to use the velocity field measurements as patient-specific inlet and outlet conditions in a numerical simulation (CFD) of the flow field and derive the flow characteristics from this field (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In either approach, the quality of the derived parameters relies on the accuracy of the PC-MRA as a source of the velocity field data.…”
Section: Research Article 795mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure gradients were determined from iterative methods, which have been validated in both phantom and animal models to provide relatively accurate answers. 11,[24][25][26][27] This technique is based on the Navier-Stokes equation, which simplifies more complex relationships by assuming the fluid to be both incompressible and Newtonian. Arterial blood flow generally satisfies these assumptions with a dynamic viscosity of approximately 4 cP (centipoise).…”
Section: Pc-viprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent to that, we iteratively refined this pressure map by using a path-averaging algorithm. 11,[24][25][26][27] Dynamic pressure maps were then averaged for comparison with in vivo measurements, and pressure differences were compared on a pressure map registered to DSA images.…”
Section: Pc-viprmentioning
confidence: 99%