2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving towards tangible decision-making tools for policy makers: Measuring and monitoring energy access provision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Health-related impacts [43,78,81,84,96,100,101] Households generally show low awareness about the risks related to the use of traditional stoves. However, they associate ICS with the improvement of health (e.g., reduced coughing, eye pain, allergy, headache).…”
Section: References General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health-related impacts [43,78,81,84,96,100,101] Households generally show low awareness about the risks related to the use of traditional stoves. However, they associate ICS with the improvement of health (e.g., reduced coughing, eye pain, allergy, headache).…”
Section: References General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regards to health-related impacts, the use of ICS is associated with a reduction in child mortality rates and improved health, especially among women and young girls who cook every day and are more in contact with stoves [100]. However, perceptions of benefits related to the use of ICS may vary according to the respondent, whose awareness of risks associated with the use of traditional cookstoves may be low [78,81].…”
Section: References General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods are available for supporting complex decisions in construction. Some of them are as follows: Kaklauskas et al (2012) proposed a Passive House model for quantitative and qualitative analyses; in Kuzman et al (2013) AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was used to compare passive house construction types; Brown et al (2013) used decision making for assessing renovation; in the work of Bucoń and Sobotka (2015), the alternatives of residential building repair are evaluated, while Cannemi et al (2014), Bhanot and Jha (2012) used decision making as a support tool for policy making; in Kalibatas et al (2011Kalibatas et al ( , 2012, Zavadskas et al (2016) the indoor environment was evaluated from the perspective of an ideal alternative; in the work of Chen et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating the impacts of VOC emissions in the US single-family houses; Hopfe et al (2013) assessed building performance; in Książek et al (2015) decision-making in construction project development was described; in Zagorskas et al (2014) MADM was used for evaluating thermal insulation alternatives of historical brick buildings in the Baltic Sea Region and Augutis et al (2014) used MADM for assessing energy infrastructure. The papers of Zavadskas et al (2014), Mardani et al (2015aMardani et al ( , 2015b presented the surveys of MADM methods.…”
Section: Using Madm Methods In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As global efforts toward alleviating energy poverty by 2030 gather momentum, the role of measurement frameworks to provide accurate, tangible empirical evidence to support policy and planning is growing increasingly important (Bhanot & Jha, ; Pachauri et al, ; B. S. Reddy, ). Among the recently developed multidimensional metrics, the MTF has been most widely applied in energy planning and modeling.…”
Section: Lessons From Recent Applications Of Multidimensional Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%