2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
135
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a study of regional flooding adaptation in the Netherlands argued that the related networks had collaborative linkages between stakeholders during master planning and more isolated interactions during implementation (van Buuren et al in press). In Australia, local government is at the 'coal-face' of action on climate adaptation and for them the potential costs of poor outcomes are highest (Barnett et al 2013;Fletcher et al 2013). Correspondingly, local government was also the only organisational type with a significant representation of within-type cooperative stakeholder interactions (Table 5, C4A2).…”
Section: Managing Policy Network For Effective Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study of regional flooding adaptation in the Netherlands argued that the related networks had collaborative linkages between stakeholders during master planning and more isolated interactions during implementation (van Buuren et al in press). In Australia, local government is at the 'coal-face' of action on climate adaptation and for them the potential costs of poor outcomes are highest (Barnett et al 2013;Fletcher et al 2013). Correspondingly, local government was also the only organisational type with a significant representation of within-type cooperative stakeholder interactions (Table 5, C4A2).…”
Section: Managing Policy Network For Effective Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, adaptation to climate change is an urgent need and increasingly important in climate policy (Beck 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones 32 and Beck 15 argue that assessing socioeconomic and natural systems vulnerabilities and adaptation to climate change, as well as identifying mitigation options, is effectively dealing with 'wicked problems'. 58 Wicked problems manifest where there is not only disagreement on the framing of a problem, but also no solution that appropriately answers to any given construction of the problem.…”
Section: Box 1 Pluralism Of Epistemic Standards and Values Of Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, arguments presented in the papers reviewed disagree with this assumption on two fronts. First, simplification of complex information on degrees of certainty masks and down-plays the importance of nuanced and fine-grained reporting of diverse value judgements on evidence, 4,15,19,21,42,49 a point also raised by users who support reporting on dissensus to better interpret evidence presented. 60 Vasileiadou et al 49 affirm that the logic of reasoning that underpins assessment of evidence, including where and how disagreements manifest, is not sufficiently transparent in the IPCC assessment process.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%