Moving Beyond Text-and-Talk in Qualitative Health Research: Methodological Considerations of Using Multiple Media for Data Collection

Abstract

Qualitative researchers are increasingly making use of multiple media to collect data within a single study. Such approaches may have the potential to generate rich insights; however, there are also potential methodological challenges in simultaneously analyzing data from multiple media. Using three case studies from our work with women who had recurrent breast cancer in South Africa, we explore four challenges of using multiple media to collect data: (a) how to understand the repetition of themes (or lack thereof) across multiple media; (b) whether or not data collected from multiple media over a protracted period should be read as longitudinal data reflecting a dynamic process; (c) what impact using multiple media has on the participant–researcher relationship; and (d) how the medium may shape the data obtained. We propose that the value of using multiple methods lies in the opportunity they provide to understand how participants engage with the different media.

Matching Digital Intervention Affordances with Tasks: The Case of a Zoom and WhatsApp Mental Health Intervention for Seniors during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…However, scholars have shown that simply order-ranking media which change over time is an oversimplification of how media are used . More recent work (Boase, 2008;Chang, 2017;Smit et al, 2021;Taylor & Bazarova, 2018) has recognized that people often combine different media to communicate. The affordances approach argues that instead of studying the use of a specific medium (which may soon become obsolete anyway), examining how people perceive media affordances -for example, interactivity, multimediality and more -can expand our understanding of how users interact with multiple media.…”

Evaluating Complex Interventions Using Qualitative Longitudinal Research: A Case Study of Understanding Pathways to Violence Prevention

“…It is therefore possible that the repeat interview process contributed to quicker or larger shifts among our interviewees than among other participants. Other researchers have pointed out that research processes, particularly longitudinal ones, can stimulate reflection ( Oakley, 2016a ), be transformative for participants ( Smit et al, 2021 ), or improve recall ( Oakley, 2016b ). Repeat interviews may improve our ability to detect and learn about the nature of participant experiences in an intervention due to a potentially accelerated response.…”

Exploring Clinical Practice and Developing Clinician Self-Reflection Through Cross Self-Confrontation Methodology: An Application Within an Addiction Medicine Unit

“…This adaptation restricted the multiplicity of dialogical settings required by CSC and contributed to another limitation, that is, participants’ partial elevation to co-researcher status. As other contemporary methodological approaches that develop within a new politics of research participation and knowledge production ( Cornwall & Jewkes, 1995 ; Smit et al, 2021 ), CSC claims a process of co-researching and associates researchers and professionals in a co-construction and co-analysis process ( Clot et al, 2000 ; Kloetzer, 2018 ). Although the expected participation of clinicians was achieved during the first two phases, clinicians tended to be less involved when finalizing and approving results during group interviews.…”