“…As shown in the relative abundance graph (Figure 8 ), the inoculum used in the CABR tests was mainly composed by different denitrifying species involved in different metabolic pathways, indicating that the biomass was fully conditioned for denitrification and reaching high RE NO. The benefit of having species diversity in denitrification processes was demonstrated by Patel et al ( 2021 ) in which he found that genera such as Pseudomonas , Thauera , Azoarcus were positively correlated with each other and enhanced the denitrification process in a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Fig.…”
The reduction of nitric oxide (NO) emissions to atmosphere has been recently addressed using biological technologies. However, NO removal through bioprocesses is quite challenging due to the low solubility of NO in water. Therefore, the abatement of NO emissions might be improved by adding a chelating agent or a mass transfer vector (MTV) to increase the solubility of this pollutant into the aqueous phase where the bioprocess takes place. This research seeks to assess the performance of different non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPs): n-hexadecane (HEX), diethyl sebacate (DSE), 1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyl-trisiloxane (HTX), 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane (HNO), and high temperature silicone oil (SO) in chemical absorption–biological reduction (CABR) integrated systems. The results showed that HNO and HTX had the maximum gas-liquid mass transfer capacity, being 0.32 mol NO/kmol NAP and 0.29 mol NO/kmol NAP, respectively. When an aqueous phase was added to the system, the mass transfer gas–liquid of NO was increased, with HTX reaching a removal efficiency of 82 ± 3% NO with water, and 88 ± 6% with a phosphate buffer solution. All NAPs were tested for short-term toxicity assessment and resulted neither toxic nor inhibitory for the biological activity (denitrification). DSE was found to be biodegradable, which could limit its applicability in biological processes for gas treatment. Finally, in the CABR system tests, it was shown that NO elimination improved in a short time (30 min) when the three mass transfer vectors (HEX, HTX, HNO) were added to enriched denitrifying bacteria.
“…As shown in the relative abundance graph (Figure 8 ), the inoculum used in the CABR tests was mainly composed by different denitrifying species involved in different metabolic pathways, indicating that the biomass was fully conditioned for denitrification and reaching high RE NO. The benefit of having species diversity in denitrification processes was demonstrated by Patel et al ( 2021 ) in which he found that genera such as Pseudomonas , Thauera , Azoarcus were positively correlated with each other and enhanced the denitrification process in a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Fig.…”
The reduction of nitric oxide (NO) emissions to atmosphere has been recently addressed using biological technologies. However, NO removal through bioprocesses is quite challenging due to the low solubility of NO in water. Therefore, the abatement of NO emissions might be improved by adding a chelating agent or a mass transfer vector (MTV) to increase the solubility of this pollutant into the aqueous phase where the bioprocess takes place. This research seeks to assess the performance of different non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPs): n-hexadecane (HEX), diethyl sebacate (DSE), 1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyl-trisiloxane (HTX), 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane (HNO), and high temperature silicone oil (SO) in chemical absorption–biological reduction (CABR) integrated systems. The results showed that HNO and HTX had the maximum gas-liquid mass transfer capacity, being 0.32 mol NO/kmol NAP and 0.29 mol NO/kmol NAP, respectively. When an aqueous phase was added to the system, the mass transfer gas–liquid of NO was increased, with HTX reaching a removal efficiency of 82 ± 3% NO with water, and 88 ± 6% with a phosphate buffer solution. All NAPs were tested for short-term toxicity assessment and resulted neither toxic nor inhibitory for the biological activity (denitrification). DSE was found to be biodegradable, which could limit its applicability in biological processes for gas treatment. Finally, in the CABR system tests, it was shown that NO elimination improved in a short time (30 min) when the three mass transfer vectors (HEX, HTX, HNO) were added to enriched denitrifying bacteria.
“…Proteobacteria and Nitrosomonas were the dominant phyla and genus, respectively, for MR1 to MR3. The Proteobacteria increased to 62.56% in MR3; Nitrosomonas increased from 0.38% to 29.53% and performed contributor to the denitrification of nitrogen wastewater [39]. The occurrence of the genus Hydrogenophaga and Desulfotomaculum at the beginning of the operation (FR1) was 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysis In Different Phases Of Mbr-mbfrmentioning
Low C/N wastewater results from a wide range of factors that significantly harm the environment. They include insufficient carbon sources, low denitrification efficiency, and NH4+-N concentrations in low C/N wastewater that are too high to be treated. In this research, the membrane biofilm reactor and hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBR-MBfR) were optimized and regulated under different operating parameters: the simulated domestic sewage with low C/N was domesticated and the domestic sewage was then denitrified. The results of the MBR-MBfR experiments indicated that a C/N ratio of two was suitable for NH4+-N, NO2−-N, NO3−-N, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal in partial nitrification-denitrification (PN-D) and hydrogen autotrophic denitrification for further treatment. The steady state for domestic wastewater was reached when the MBR-MBfR in the experimental conditions of HRT = 15 h, SRT = 20 d, 0.04 Mpa for H2 pressure in MBfR, 0.4–0.8 mg/L DO in MBR, MLSS = 2500 mg/L(MBR) and 2800 mg/L(MBfR), and effluent concentrations of NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and NO2−-N were 4.3 ± 0.5, 1.95 ± 0.04, and 2.05 ± 0.15 mg/L, respectively. High-throughput sequencing results revealed the following: (1) The genus Nitrosomonas as the ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and Denitratisoma as potential denitrifiers were simultaneously enriched in the MBR; (2) at the genus level, Meiothermus,Lentimicrobium, Thauera,Hydrogenophaga, and Desulfotomaculum played a dominant role in leading to NO3−-N and NO2−-N removal in the MBfR.
“…This type of barrier to natural top-down control can be overcome by rearing consumers to high abundance elsewhere in controlled settings and inundating the pests precisely when it allows the natural enemies to gain the upper hand. In the case of controlling HABs, culturable HBF that are antagonistic against toxic cyanobacteria would be conducive to this approach, given their handleability and rapid growth rates [150,151]. Similar applications of (beneficial) microbes have been utilized in contaminant remediations of soil and water [85,152].…”
Section: Manipulation Of Natural Enemiesmentioning
Water resources are critically important, but also pose risks of exposure to toxic and pathogenic microbes. Increasingly, a concern is toxic cyanobacteria, which have been linked to the death and disease of humans, domesticated animals, and wildlife in freshwater systems worldwide. Management approaches successful at reducing cyanobacterial abundance and toxin production have tended to be short-term solutions applied on small scales (e.g., algaecide application) or solutions that entail difficult multifaceted investments (e.g., modification of landscape and land use to reduce nutrient inputs). However, implementation of these approaches can be undermined by microbial species interactions that (a) provide toxic cyanobacteria with protection against the method of control or (b) permit toxic cyanobacteria to be replaced by other significant microbial threats. Understanding these interactions is necessary to avoid such scenarios and can provide a framework for novel strategies to enhance freshwater resource management via systems science (e.g., pairing existing physical and chemical approaches against cyanobacteria with ecological strategies such as manipulation of natural enemies, targeting of facilitators, and reduction of benthic occupancy and recruitment). Here, we review pertinent examples of the interactions and highlight potential applications of what is known.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
