Mouse models for human DNA mismatch-repair gene defects

Wei, Kai; Kucherlapati, Raju; Edelmann, Winfried

doi:10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02359-6

Cited by 116 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This amazing exactitude is contingent upon the serial action of DNA polymerase selectivity, exonucleolytic proofreading, and DNA mismatch repair (MMR). MMR defects increase spontaneous mutagenesis in numerous model systems (2) and give rise to cancer in mice (3). In humans, inherited mutations in MMR genes predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (4,5).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Colon cancer-associated mutator DNA polymerase δ variant causes expansion of dNTP pools increasing its own infidelity

Mertz

Sharma²,

Chabes

et al. 2015

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Defects in DNA polymerases δ (Polδ) and e (Pole) cause hereditary colorectal cancer and have been implicated in the etiology of some sporadic colorectal and endometrial tumors. We previously reported that the yeast pol3-R696W allele mimicking a human cancer-associated variant, POLD1-R689W, causes a catastrophic increase in spontaneous mutagenesis. Here, we describe the mechanism of this extraordinary mutator effect. We found that the mutation rate increased synergistically when the R696W mutation was combined with defects in Polδ proofreading or mismatch repair, indicating that pathways correcting DNA replication errors are not compromised in pol3-R696W mutants. DNA synthesis by purified Polδ-R696W was error-prone, but not to the extent that could account for the unprecedented mutator phenotype of pol3-R696W strains. In a search for cellular factors that augment the mutagenic potential of Polδ-R696W, we discovered that pol3-R696W causes S-phase checkpoint-dependent elevation of dNTP pools. Abrogating this elevation by strategic mutations in dNTP metabolism genes eliminated the mutator effect of pol3-R696W, whereas restoration of high intracellular dNTP levels restored the mutator phenotype. Further, the use of dNTP concentrations present in pol3-R696W cells for in vitro DNA synthesis greatly decreased the fidelity of Polδ-R696W and produced a mutation spectrum strikingly similar to the spectrum observed in vivo. The results support a model in which (i) faulty synthesis by Polδ-R696W leads to a checkpoint-dependent increase in dNTP levels and (ii) this increase mediates the hypermutator effect of Polδ-R696W by facilitating the extension of mismatched primer termini it creates and by promoting further errors that continue to fuel the mutagenic pathway.DNA polymerase δ | colon cancer | dNTP pools | mutagenesis | DNA replication fidelity W hen functioning properly, DNA replication is phenomenally accurate, making ∼10 −10 mutations per base pair during each replication cycle (1). In respect to human biology, it means that, on average, less than one mutation occurs each time the human genome is replicated. This amazing exactitude is contingent upon the serial action of DNA polymerase selectivity, exonucleolytic proofreading, and DNA mismatch repair (MMR). MMR defects increase spontaneous mutagenesis in numerous model systems (2) and give rise to cancer in mice (3). In humans, inherited mutations in MMR genes predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (4, 5). Additionally, MMR genes are inactivated via hypermethylation in ∼15% of sporadic CRC, endometrial cancer (EC), and gastric cancer (6).Like defects in MMR, mutations that decrease the base selectivity or proofreading activity of replicative DNA polymerases elevate spontaneous mutagenesis in eukaryotic cells (7-14) and cancer incidence in mice (15)(16)(17)(18). Germline mutations affecting the exonuclease domains of DNA polymerases δ (Polδ) and e (Pole) cause hereditary CRC (19), and somatic changes in the exonuclease domain of Pole were found in sporad...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Colon cancer-associated mutator DNA polymerase δ variant causes expansion of dNTP pools increasing its own infidelity

Mertz

Sharma²,

Chabes

et al. 2015

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In mammals, mutator phenotypes are proposed to accelerate the process of somatic cell evolution during tumorigenesis (Loeb et al 1974(Loeb et al , 2008. Deep sequencing of spontaneous tumors provides evidence for a mutator phenotype (Fox et al 2009;Loeb 2011), and genetic defects in MMR or Pol proofreading elevate cancer susceptibility (Wei et al 2002;Peltomäki 2005;Preston et al 2010). However, mutator phenotypes do not persist indefinitely.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergence of DNA Polymerase ε Antimutators That Escape Error-Induced Extinction in Yeast

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DNA polymerases (Pols) e and d perform the bulk of yeast leading-and lagging-strand DNA synthesis. Both Pols possess intrinsic proofreading exonucleases that edit errors during polymerization. Rare errors that elude proofreading are extended into duplex DNA and excised by the mismatch repair (MMR) system. Strains that lack Pol proofreading or MMR exhibit a 10-to 100-fold increase in spontaneous mutation rate (mutator phenotype), and inactivation of both Pol d proofreading (pol3-01) and MMR is lethal due to replication error-induced extinction (EEX). It is unclear whether a similar synthetic lethal relationship exists between defects in Pol e proofreading (pol2-4) and MMR. Using a plasmid-shuffling strategy in haploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we observed synthetic lethality of pol2-4 with alleles that completely abrogate MMR (msh2D, mlh1D, msh3D msh6D, or pms1D mlh3D) but not with partial MMR loss (msh3D, msh6D, pms1D, or mlh3D), indicating that high levels of unrepaired Pol e errors drive extinction. However, variants that escape this error-induced extinction (eex mutants) frequently emerged. Five percent of pol2-4 msh2D eex mutants encoded second-site changes in Pol e that reduced the pol2-4 mutator phenotype between 3-and 23-fold. The remaining eex alleles were extragenic to pol2-4. The locations of antimutator amino-acid changes in Pol e and their effects on mutation spectra suggest multiple mechanisms of mutator suppression. Our data indicate that unrepaired leading-and lagging-strand polymerase errors drive extinction within a few cell divisions and suggest that there are polymerase-specific pathways of mutator suppression. The prevalence of suppressors extragenic to the Pol e gene suggests that factors in addition to proofreading and MMR influence leading-strand DNA replication fidelity.O RGANISMS must accurately duplicate their genomes to avoid loss of long-term fitness. Consequently, cells employ high-fidelity DNA polymerases (Pols) equipped with proofreading exonucleases to replicate their DNA (reviewed in McCulloch and Kunkel 2008;Reha-Krantz 2010). Mismatch repair (MMR) further ensures the integrity of genetic information by targeting mismatches for excision from newly replicated DNA (reviewed in Kolodner and Marsischky 1999;Iyer et al. 2006;Hsieh and Yamane 2008). These polymerase error-correcting mechanisms, together with DNA damage repair (Friedberg et al. 2006), maintain the genome with less than one mutation per 10 9 nucleotides per cell division (Drake et al. 1998). Defects in proofreading or MMR result in mutator phenotypes characterized by increased rates of spontaneous mutation (Kolodner and Marsischky 1999;Iyer et al. 2006;Hsieh and Yamane 2008;McCulloch and Kunkel 2008; RehaKrantz 2010).Mutator phenotypes can be an important source of genetic diversity, which facilitates adaptation to environmental change. In bacterial and yeast populations, unstable environments favor mutator strains that readily acquire adaptive mutations (Chao and Cox 1983;Mao et al. 1997;Sniegowski et al. 1997...

show abstract

“…DNA repair | mismatch repair | smFRET | trinucelotide expansion I nsertion or deletion of small extrahelical loops is one of the most common mutations in human cancers (1)(2)(3), but the mechanism by which they occur is unknown. Small loops, bulges, or kinked DNA occur frequently in DNA, and provide signals for p53 recognition (4-7), recombination (8,9), and/or most often removal by the mismatch repair system (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conformational trapping of Mismatch Recognition Complex MSH2/MSH3 on repair-resistant DNA loops

Lang

Coats

Majka

et al. 2011

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insertion and deletion of small heteroduplex loops are common mutations in DNA, but why some loops are prone to mutation and others are efficiently repaired is unknown. Here we report that the mismatch recognition complex, MSH2/MSH3, discriminates between a repair-competent and a repair-resistant loop by sensing the conformational dynamics of their junctions. MSH2/MSH3 binds, bends, and dissociates from repair-competent loops to signal downstream repair. Repair-resistant Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine (CAG) loops adopt a unique DNA junction that traps nucleotide-bound MSH2/MSH3, and inhibits its dissociation from the DNA. We envision that junction dynamics is an active participant and a conformational regulator of repair signaling, and governs whether a loop is removed by MSH2/MSH3 or escapes to become a precursor for mutation.

show abstract

Mouse models for human DNA mismatch-repair gene defects

Cited by 116 publications

References 61 publications

Colon cancer-associated mutator DNA polymerase δ variant causes expansion of dNTP pools increasing its own infidelity

Colon cancer-associated mutator DNA polymerase δ variant causes expansion of dNTP pools increasing its own infidelity

Emergence of DNA Polymerase ε Antimutators That Escape Error-Induced Extinction in Yeast

Conformational trapping of Mismatch Recognition Complex MSH2/MSH3 on repair-resistant DNA loops

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About