Maintaining the chemical identity of DNA depends on ribonucleotide exclusion by DNA polymerases. However, ribonucleotide exclusion during DNA synthesis in vitro is imperfect. To determine if ribonucleotides are incorporated during DNA replication in vivo, we substituted leucine or glycine for an active site methionine in yeast DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε). Compared to wild type Pol ε, ribonucleotide incorporation in vitro was 3-fold lower for M644L and 11-fold higher for M644G Pol ε. This hierarchy was re-capitulated in vivo in yeast strains lacking RNase H2. Moreover, the pol2-M644G rnh201Δ strain progressed more slowly through S-phase, had elevated dNTP pools and generated 2–5 base pair deletions in repetitive sequences at a high rate and gene orientation-dependent manner. The data indicate that ribonucleotides are incorporated during replication in vivo, that they are removed by RNase H2-dependent repair, and that defective repair results in replicative stress and genome instability via DNA strand misalignment.

Measurements of nucleoside triphosphate levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal that the four rNTPs are in 36-to 190-fold molar excess over their corresponding dNTPs. During DNA synthesis in vitro using the physiological nucleoside triphosphate concentrations, yeast DNA polymerase ε, which is implicated in leading strand replication, incorporates one rNMP for every 1,250 dNMPs. Pol δ and Pol α, which conduct lagging strand replication, incorporate one rNMP for every 5,000 or 625 dNMPs, respectively. Discrimination against rNMP incorporation varies widely, in some cases by more than 100-fold, depending on the identity of the base and the template sequence context in which it is located. Given estimates of the amount of replication catalyzed by Pols α, δ, and ε, the results are consistent with the possibility that more than 10,000 rNMPs may be incorporated into the nuclear genome during each round of replication in yeast. Thus, rNMPs may be the most common noncanonical nucleotides introduced into the eukaryotic genome. Potential beneficial and negative consequences of abundant ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA are discussed, including the possibility that unrepaired rNMPs in DNA could be problematic because yeast DNA polymerase ε has difficulty bypassing a single rNMP present within a DNA template.DNA replication | nucleotide precursors | nucleotide selectivity T he integrity of the eukaryotic genome is ensured in part by the chemical nature of the storage medium-DNA. Compared to RNA, DNA is inherently more resistant to strand cleavage due to the absence of a reactive 2′ hydroxyl on the ribose ring. The active sites of most DNA polymerases are evolved to efficiently exclude ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) from being incorporated during DNA synthesis (reviewed in (1)). However, rNTP exclusion is not absolute. Early studies (reviewed in (1, 2)) revealed that DNA polymerases do incorporate rNMPs during DNA synthesis. Kinetic studies (3-13) have further demonstrated that selectivity for insertion of dNMPs into DNA rather than rNMPs varies from 10-fold to >10 6 -fold, depending on the DNA polymerase and the dNTP/rNTP pair examined. rNMP incorporation during DNA synthesis is potentially made more probable by the fact that the concentrations of rNTPs in vivo are higher than are the concentrations of dNTPs (e.g., see refs. 2, 14 and results of this study). Thus some rNMPs are likely to be stably incorporated into DNA during replication, and possibly during DNA repair, e.g., nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) of double strand breaks in DNA (9, 15). This possibility is supported by biochemical studies implicating RNase H2 and FEN1 in the repair of single ribonucleotides in DNA (16,17). It is therefore of interest to know just how frequently rNMPs are incorporated into DNA by the DNA polymerases that synthesize the most DNA in a eukaryotic cell, namely DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε. Here we investigate this by first measuring the rNTP and dNTP concentrations in budding yeast. We then use these concentrations in DNA sy...

In eukaryotes, DNA damage elicits a multifaceted response that includes cell cycle arrest, transcriptional activation of DNA repair genes, and, in multicellular organisms, apoptosis. We demonstrate that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA damage leads to a 6- to 8-fold increase in dNTP levels. This increase is conferred by an unusual, relaxed dATP feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). Complete elimination of dATP feedback inhibition by mutation of the allosteric activity site in RNR results in 1.6-2 times higher dNTP pools under normal growth conditions, and the pools increase an additional 11- to 17-fold during DNA damage. The increase in dNTP pools dramatically improves survival following DNA damage, but at the same time leads to higher mutation rates. We propose that increased survival and mutation rates result from more efficient translesion DNA synthesis at elevated dNTP concentrations.

SAMHD1 was previously characterized as a dNTPase that protects cells from viral infections. Mutations in SAMHD1 are implicated in cancer development and in a severe congenital inflammatory disease known as Aicardi-Goutières syndrome. The mechanism by which SAMHD1 protects against cancer and chronic inflammation is unknown. Here we show that SAMHD1 promotes degradation of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks in human cell lines by stimulating the exonuclease activity of MRE11. This function activates the ATR-CHK1 checkpoint and allows the forks to restart replication. In SAMHD1-depleted cells, single-stranded DNA fragments are released from stalled forks and accumulate in the cytosol, where they activate the cGAS-STING pathway to induce expression of pro-inflammatory type I interferons. SAMHD1 is thus an important player in the replication stress response, which prevents chronic inflammation by limiting the release of single-stranded DNA from stalled replication forks.

E2F transcriptional regulators control human-cell proliferation by repressing and activating the transcription of genes required for cell-cycle progression, particularly the S phase. E2F proteins repress transcription in association with retinoblastoma pocket proteins, but less is known about how they activate transcription. Here, we show that the human G1 phase regulator HCF-1 associates with both activator (E2F1 and E2F3a) and repressor (E2F4) E2F proteins, properties that are conserved in insect cells. Human HCF-1-E2F interactions are versatile: their associations and binding to E2F-responsive promoters are cell-cycle selective, and HCF-1 displays coactivator properties when bound to the E2F1 activator and corepressor properties when bound to the E2F4 repressor. During the G1-to-S phase transition, HCF-1 recruits the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) and Set-1 histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferases to E2F-responsive promoters and induces histone methylation and transcriptional activation. These results suggest that HCF-1 induces cell-cycle-specific transcriptional activation by E2F proteins to promote cell proliferation.

The evolutionarily conserved protein kinases Mec1 and Rad53 are required for checkpoint response and growth. Here we show that their role in growth is to remove the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 to ensure DNA replication. Sml1 protein levels¯uctuate during the cell cycle, being lowest during S phase. The disappearance of Sml1 protein in S phase is due to post-transcriptional regulation and is associated with protein phosphorylation. Both phosphorylation and diminution of Sml1 require MEC1 and RAD53. Moreover, failure to remove Sml1 in mec1 and rad53 mutants results in incomplete DNA replication, defective mitochondrial DNA propagation, decreased dNTP levels and cell death. Interestingly, similar regulation of Sml1 also occurs after DNA damage. In this case, the regulation requires MEC1 and RAD53, as well as other checkpoint genes. Therefore, Sml1 is a new target of the DNA damage checkpoint and its removal is a conserved function of Mec1 and Rad53 during growth and after damage. Keywords: checkpoint/Mec1/protein phosphorylation/ Rad53/ribonucleotide reductase IntroductionIn the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mec1 and Rad53 protein kinases are essential both after DNA damage and during cell growth (Zheng et al., 1993;Kato and Ogawa, 1994;Weinert et al., 1994). In response to DNA damage, they function as signal transducers in all known checkpoint pathways (reviewed in Elledge, 1996). Rad53 usually functions downstream of Mec1 and, together, they receive signals from upstream sensor proteins transmitting them to components of the cell cycle engine. Consequently, cell cycle progression is arrested or delayed, providing time for repair. In addition, Mec1 and Rad53 also increase the capacity of the cell to repair DNA lesions. One route is by the transcriptional induction of various DNA repair proteins, including ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), the enzyme that catalyzes the ratelimiting step of both deoxyribonucleotide (dNTP) and DNA synthesis (reviewed in Reichard, 1988). However, additional interfaces between the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint pathway and DNA repair are probably required to maximize protection of genetic integrity. A better understanding of such interactions relies on the discovery of new targets of checkpoint control.The checkpoint function of Mec1 and Rad53 is evolutionarily conserved. Their mammalian homologs, ATM/ATR and CHK2, also function as signal transducers and affect multiple components of the cell cycle and DNA repair machinery during the response to DNA damage (reviewed in Rotman and Shiloh, 1999). For example, ATM/ATR and CHK2 activate and stabilize p53, which in turn leads to the transcriptional induction of a variety of genes, including that of RNR (Tanaka et al., 2000;Zhao et al., 2000a; reviewed in Caspari, 2000).The conservation between Mec1/Rad53 and their mammalian homologs may extend beyond their checkpoint functions. These proteins are also important for normal cell growth; in yeast, deletion of MEC1 or RAD53 is lethal (Zheng et al., 1993;Kato and Ogawa, 1994) and, in mice, de...

DNA replication initiated by one-ended homologous recombination at a double-strand break is highly inaccurate, as it greatly stimulates frameshift mutations over the entire path of the replication fork.

Intracellular deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pools must be tightly regulated to preserve genome integrity. Indeed, alterations in dNTP pools are associated with increased mutagenesis, genomic instability and tumourigenesis. However, the mechanisms by which altered or imbalanced dNTP pools affect DNA synthesis remain poorly understood. Here, we show that changes in intracellular dNTP levels affect replication dynamics in budding yeast in different ways. Upregulation of the activity of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) increases elongation, indicating that dNTP pools are limiting for normal DNA replication. In contrast, inhibition of RNR activity with hydroxyurea (HU) induces a sharp transition to a slowreplication mode within minutes after S-phase entry. Upregulation of RNR activity delays this transition and modulates both fork speed and origin usage under replication stress. Interestingly, we also observed that chromosomal instability (CIN) mutants have increased dNTP pools and show enhanced DNA synthesis in the presence of HU. Since upregulation of RNR promotes fork progression in the presence of DNA lesions, we propose that CIN mutants adapt to chronic replication stress by upregulating dNTP pools.