2018
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse DC-SIGN/CD209a as Target for Antigen Delivery and Adaptive Immunity

Abstract: The efficacy of vaccination studies aimed at targeting antigens to human DC-SIGN (hDC-SIGN) have been notoriously difficult to study in vivo, as eight dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3 grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) homologs have been described in mice. CD209a/SIGNR5 has been coined as the mouse DC-SIGN (mDC-SIGN) ortholog, based on its expression and location in the genome. Nonetheless, which properties of hDC-SIGN are covered by mDC-SIGN is poorly investigated. One of the most import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 This may explain the relative decrease in T cell frequency and stable B cell responses when moDCs are targeted at the peak of abundancy in the skin. We have corroborated previously results showing CD209a expression on cDC2s in the lymph node 23 which may explain the intact T cell responses using CD209a-targeting antibody (compared to untargeted approach) while increasing the humoral responses via moDCs. Finally, we have performed our functional immunization experiment including agonistic CD40 antibody (αCD40) as adjuvants accompanying the antigen (ie, vaccine).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…45 This may explain the relative decrease in T cell frequency and stable B cell responses when moDCs are targeted at the peak of abundancy in the skin. We have corroborated previously results showing CD209a expression on cDC2s in the lymph node 23 which may explain the intact T cell responses using CD209a-targeting antibody (compared to untargeted approach) while increasing the humoral responses via moDCs. Finally, we have performed our functional immunization experiment including agonistic CD40 antibody (αCD40) as adjuvants accompanying the antigen (ie, vaccine).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is crucial in the context of vaccine delivery and T cell activation for cancer immunotherapy. Indeed, we and others have previously shown that antigen targeting toward DC-SIGN using antibodies induces efficient antigen-specific T cell responses in in vitro and in vivo models (15,70,71). Using fucose-containing glycans as ligands to target DC-SIGN, we previously generated liposome or dendrimers to codeliver antigen and adjuvant to DC-SIGN + DCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations are needed to determine the corresponding UPEC ligands, as we did previously for the identification of the carbohydrate LPS core from many Gram-negative bacteria (Klena et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 2006Zhang et al, , 2008Yang et al, 2015Yang et al, , 2019He et al, 2019;Ye et al, 2019). Several studies showed that in vivo targeting of CD209s drastically enhances antigen presentation as well as persistent CD8+/CD4+ T-cell-mediated protective immunity against intracellular pathogens (Singh et al, 2009;Unger et al, 2012;Hesse et al, 2013;Schetters et al, 2018). Thus, given the protective role of SIGNR1 in UTIs, the interaction between UPEC and CD209s should be targeted in treatment strategies to prevent persistent UTIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%