2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motorcyclist perception response time in stopping sight distance situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…0.23, min 0.25, max 0.96), which was obtained from a wide range of participant ages (13−54 years old) and/or riding experience (from less than 2 to more than 15 years). These values are similar to those of previous studies; for example, the 0.68 s found by (Davoodi et al, 2012). In addition, as the object (motorcyclists' braking capability) and experimental method (on a dry and level closed circuit course, with a speed range of 50−60 km/h, in expected conditions) were also similar, then the values can be used to calculate the minimum SSD.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0.23, min 0.25, max 0.96), which was obtained from a wide range of participant ages (13−54 years old) and/or riding experience (from less than 2 to more than 15 years). These values are similar to those of previous studies; for example, the 0.68 s found by (Davoodi et al, 2012). In addition, as the object (motorcyclists' braking capability) and experimental method (on a dry and level closed circuit course, with a speed range of 50−60 km/h, in expected conditions) were also similar, then the values can be used to calculate the minimum SSD.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Accordingly, it is understandable that accident risk management is top of the agenda in the Decade of Action (DoA) of Road Safety 2011-2020 (WHO, 2011). The Indonesian National General Plan of To date, in order to calculate the MSSD for particular conditions, AASHTO (2011) recommends the use of a reaction time of 1.64 s, whereas Davoodi et al (2012) found that this could be less than 1 s, i.e. 0.68 s. In addition, although previous studies have found that the braking deceleration rate could be greater than 4.5 m/s² (Fambro et al, 1997), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the obtained minimum reaction and downshifting time was 0.53 s, little shorter than similar previous related study finding, i.e. 0.68 s [15], whilst the average engine braking deceleration rate was around 1.29 m/s². This indicates that engine braking deceleration rate was influenced by speed choices, and may well also influenced by the air pressure of the tire and aerodynamically factors.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 31 Traffic And Risk Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Valid primes for an upcoming lane change resulted in significantly shorter reaction times to initiate the lane change, and significantly shorter kinematic phases for the first point of reversal of steering wheel movement [10]. The positive impact of response priming (and in general of alerting the driver to potential conflicts) on reaction times has been supported by other studies in the real world; both with regard to passenger vehicles on a test track [6], and also motorcycle riders on a flat stretch of road [3].…”
Section: The Current State Of Anticipation In Driving Research Benefimentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, we hyporthesize in Stahl et al [3] that anticipation aids in the realization of a given driver's individual goals in general, and therefore should not be argued to exclusively benefit either safety, or eco-driving, or both. An aggressive driver could use anticipatory competence to make quick headway by anticipating the movements of surrounding traffic in such a way as to choose the quickest path.…”
Section: The Current State Of Anticipation In Driving Research Benefimentioning
confidence: 77%