2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor resonance mechanisms are preserved in Alzheimer’s disease patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(88 reference statements)
3
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In implicit task, HC pointing velocities varied as a consequence of the stimuli velocities, suggesting an intact ability to automatically match the perceived kinematics with brain action representation, as already shown in previous studies on both young and elderly healthy participants [20,24]. As expected, imitation performance was improved when HC was explicitly instructed to reproduce the stimulus velocity.…”
Section: Kinematic Features Of the Participants' Pointing Movement Insupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In implicit task, HC pointing velocities varied as a consequence of the stimuli velocities, suggesting an intact ability to automatically match the perceived kinematics with brain action representation, as already shown in previous studies on both young and elderly healthy participants [20,24]. As expected, imitation performance was improved when HC was explicitly instructed to reproduce the stimulus velocity.…”
Section: Kinematic Features Of the Participants' Pointing Movement Insupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The task is a modified version of that described in previous studies of our group [20,23,24]. All participants were seated in a darkened room in front of a large rear projection screen (170*230) placed 10 cm beyond the end of participants' extended arm.…”
Section: Movement Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify the occurrence of motor contagion we used the same procedure already applied in our previous studies [24], [28] and we considered movement mean velocity (V) as outcome parameter. Thus, we tested if the velocity of the visual model influenced participants' velocity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were requested either to move their hands into a pre-specified final position or to put an object into a container after they had seen the demonstrator performing the same task at various execution velocities. We measured the degree of motor contagion (i.e., how much participants' velocity was affected by demonstrator' velocity), considering that the more motor resonance is evoked, the more participants' motor response is influenced by the observed motion [24], [28]. If the activation of the motor resonance mechanisms relies mostly on the possibility to match the observer's motor repertoire with that of the visual model, motor contagion will appear in all conditions, irrespective of the nature of the demonstrator (human/robot) and the shape of the covered trajectory (smooth-curvilinear/jerky-artificial), but will be absent when the demonstrator exhibits non-biological kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%